Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 21;7(1):1.
doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00121-1.

Characteristics of 'mega' peer-reviewers

Danielle B Rice  1   2 , Ba' Pham  3 , Justin Presseau  4   5   6 , Andrea C Tricco  7   8   9 , David Moher  10   11   12
Affiliations

Characteristics of 'mega' peer-reviewers

Danielle B Rice et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. .

Erratum in

  • Correction: Characteristics of 'mega' peer-reviewers.
    Rice DB, Pham B, Presseau J, Tricco AC, Moher D. Rice DB, et al. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022 Jul 13;7(1):5. doi: 10.1186/s41073-022-00124-y. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2022. PMID: 35831912 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

Abstract

Background: The demand for peer reviewers is often perceived as disproportionate to the supply and availability of reviewers. Considering characteristics associated with peer review behaviour can allow for the development of solutions to manage the growing demand for peer reviewers. The objective of this research was to compare characteristics among two groups of reviewers registered in Publons.

Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study design was used to compare characteristics between (1) individuals completing at least 100 peer reviews ('mega peer reviewers') from January 2018 to December 2018 as and (2) a control group of peer reviewers completing between 1 and 18 peer reviews over the same time period. Data was provided by Publons, which offers a repository of peer reviewer activities in addition to tracking peer reviewer publications and research metrics. Mann Whitney tests and chi-square tests were conducted comparing characteristics (e.g., number of publications, number of citations, word count of peer review) of mega peer reviewers to the control group of reviewers.

Results: A total of 1596 peer reviewers had data provided by Publons. A total of 396 M peer reviewers and a random sample of 1200 control group reviewers were included. A greater proportion of mega peer reviews were male (92%) as compared to the control reviewers (70% male). Mega peer reviewers demonstrated a significantly greater average number of total publications, citations, receipt of Publons awards, and a higher average h index as compared to the control group of reviewers (all p < .001). We found no statistically significant differences in the number of words between the groups (p > .428).

Conclusions: Mega peer reviewers registered in the Publons database also had a higher number of publications and citations as compared to a control group of reviewers. Additional research that considers motivations associated with peer review behaviour should be conducted to help inform peer reviewing activity.

Keywords: Characteristics of reviewers; Peer review; Publons.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

David Moher is a Publons Academy advisor. All other authors declare no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Elsevier . What is peer review. 2020.
    1. Publons. 2018 Global State of Peer Review 2018. Available from: https://publons.com/community/gspr#open-elq-form-slider-DLGSPR. Accessed December 20, 2020.
    1. Beaumont LJ. Peer reviewers need a code of conduct too. Nature. 2019;572(7770):439–440. doi: 10.1038/d41586-019-02492-w. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bohannon J. Who's afraid of peer review. Science. 2013;342(6154):60–65. doi: 10.1126/science.2013.342.6154.342_60. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gerwing TG, Gerwing AMA, Avery-Gomm S, Choi C-Y, Clements JC, Rash JA. Quantifying professionalism in peer review. Res Integr Peer Rev. 2020;5(1):1–8. doi: 10.1186/s41073-020-00096-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources