Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Jun;303(3):620-631.
doi: 10.1148/radiol.203296. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

18F-FSPG PET/CT Imaging of System xC- Transporter Activity in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

18F-FSPG PET/CT Imaging of System xC- Transporter Activity in Patients with Primary and Metastatic Brain Tumors

Mirwais Wardak et al. Radiology. 2022 Jun.

Abstract

Background The PET tracer (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) targets the system xC- cotransporter, which is overexpressed in various tumors. Purpose To assess the role of 18F-FSPG PET/CT in intracranial malignancies. Materials and Methods Twenty-six patients (mean age, 54 years ± 12; 17 men; 48 total lesions) with primary brain tumors (n = 17) or brain metastases (n = 9) were enrolled in this prospective, single-center study (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT02370563) between November 2014 and March 2016. A 30-minute dynamic brain 18F-FSPG PET/CT scan and a static whole-body (WB) 18F-FSPG PET/CT scan at 60-75 minutes were acquired. Moreover, all participants underwent MRI, and four participants underwent fluorine 18 (18F) fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) PET imaging. PET parameters and their relative changes were obtained for all lesions. Kinetic modeling was used to estimate the 18F-FSPG tumor rate constants using the dynamic and dynamic plus WB PET data. Imaging parameters were correlated to lesion outcomes, as determined with follow-up MRI and/or pathologic examination. The Mann-Whitney U test or Student t test was used for group mean comparisons. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used for performance comparison of different decision measures. Results 18F-FSPG PET/CT helped identify all 48 brain lesions. The mean tumor-to-background ratio (TBR) on the whole-brain PET images at the WB time point was 26.6 ± 24.9 (range: 2.6-150.3). When 18F-FDG PET was performed, 18F-FSPG permitted visualization of non-18F-FDG-avid lesions or allowed better lesion differentiation from surrounding tissues. In participants with primary brain tumors, the predictive accuracy of the relative changes in influx rate constant Ki and maximum standardized uptake value to discriminate between poor and good lesion outcomes were 89% and 81%, respectively. There were significant differences in the 18F-FSPG uptake curves of lesions with good versus poor outcomes in the primary brain tumor group (P < .05) but not in the brain metastases group. Conclusion PET/CT imaging with (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) helped detect primary brain tumors and brain metastases with a high tumor-to-background ratio. Relative changes in 18F-FSPG uptake with multi-time-point PET appear to be helpful in predicting lesion outcomes. Clinical trial registration no. NCT02370563 © RSNA, 2022 Online supplemental material is available for this article.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosures of Conflicts of Interest: M.W. No relevant relationships. I.S. No relevant relationships. A.P.F. No relevant relationships. R.M. No relevant relationships. M.J. Payment from Quality Care Solution. N.H. No relevant relationships. G.Z. Editorial board member, board membership on Subtle Medical; grants from NIH R01-EB025220, GE Healthcare sponsored research; payments from Biogen for advisory board for ARIA; payment to institution for various MR, PET, and AI patents; royalties from Cambridge University Press; stock options in Subtle Medical; travel/accommodations/meeting expenses from Subtle Medical. N.F. No relevant relationships. S.N. No relevant relationships. G.L. No relevant relationships. N.K. Payment from Life Molecular, Tegeler Str. 6-7; FSPG patents from Life Molecular Imaging. M.B. Patents from Life Molecular Imaging. S.B. No relevant relationships. A.W.S. FSPG patents from Life Molecular Imaging. L.M.D. FSPG patents from Life Molecular Imaging. T.A. No relevant relationships. H.C.M. No relevant relationships. J.R. No relevant relationships. F.T.C. Grant from Life Molecular Imaging; paid consultant for GE Healthcare; paid to help set up and promote clinical cyclotron and radiochemistry operation in Latin America for IQ Pharma; grant from the National Cancer Institute. S.S.G. Board membership from Life Molecular Imaging; consultancy for Life Molecular Imaging; grants from Life Molecular Imaging. E.S.M. Consultancy for AAA/Novartis; payment for lectures from AAA/Novartis; payment for development of educational presentations from Curium Pharma.

Figures

None
Graphical abstract
(A) Images in a 63-year-old woman (participant 13) with right
temporoparietal glioblastoma multiforme treated with surgery, followed by
chemotherapy (temozolomide) and radiation therapy. MRI findings are
equivocal for residual disease versus posttreatment change. Static
(4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) PET image (left) shows
intense uptake in the tumor lesion (arrow), which is visible on the
postcontrast three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MRI scan (arrow,
middle). The tumor time-activity curve (TAC) from the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET
images (right) shows a rapidly increasing uptake over time in the
glioblastoma multiforme lesion with an early peak uptake in the first 10
frames. In the background tissue TAC, there is an early peak in the first 10
frames followed by a downward slope and an eventual plateau near zero
activity in the final 28 frames. Subsequent pathologic examination confirmed
the presence of malignant cells. The outcome score for this lesion was a 5.
SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value. (B) Images in a 44-year-old man
(participant 4) with glioblastoma multiforme in the right temporal lobe
treated with surgery, followed by chemotherapy and repeat resection showing
no tumor. MRI scan (middle) shows an area of contrast enhancement concerning
for progression (arrow). Static 18F-FSPG PET image (left) shows weak uptake
(arrow). The lesion TAC from the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET images (right) shows a
plateau line after an early uptake peak, and higher uptake values in the
tumor lesion at late times when compared to background, with a slight and
slow tendency to increase over time. Subsequent pathologic examination
showed necrosis and reactive changes with no definite glial neoplasm. The
outcome score for this lesion was a 1. (C) Images in a 77-year-old man
(participant 2) with grade III unresectable anaplastic astrocytoma of the
temporal lobe (postradiation therapy). Baseline MRI scan (middle) shows a
lesion with two separate components, one medial (lesion 1, red arrow) and
one lateral (lesion 2, green arrow). Static 18F-FSPG PET image (left) shows
prominent uptake medially (SUVmax = 12), and weak uptake laterally (lesion
SUVmax = 3 on whole body [WB] PET). Follow-up MRI scan (middle) obtained 4
months after baseline shows an increase in size of the medial component,
while the lateral component remains stable. In the background volume of
interest, the TAC on the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET scan (right) shows an
exponential decaying behavior after an early uptake peak. A similar TAC
pattern is seen in the lateral lesion, but with higher uptake values at late
times when compared to the background volume of interest, with a slight and
slow tendency to increase over time. The medial lesion shows rapidly
increasing uptake over time throughout the whole duration of the dynamic PET
acquisition. The slight tendency of 18F-FSPG uptake to increase in the
lateral (nonenhancing) component of the tumor, and the mild uptake on the WB
late scan (SUVmax = 3), suggests a “wait and watch” approach
would be best for this lesion. Mild uptake indicates uptake slightly higher
than surrounding background (healthy tissue). The outcome score for both
lesions in this patient was a 4.
Figure 1:
(A) Images in a 63-year-old woman (participant 13) with right temporoparietal glioblastoma multiforme treated with surgery, followed by chemotherapy (temozolomide) and radiation therapy. MRI findings are equivocal for residual disease versus posttreatment change. Static (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) PET image (left) shows intense uptake in the tumor lesion (arrow), which is visible on the postcontrast three-dimensional spoiled gradient-echo MRI scan (arrow, middle). The tumor time-activity curve (TAC) from the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET images (right) shows a rapidly increasing uptake over time in the glioblastoma multiforme lesion with an early peak uptake in the first 10 frames. In the background tissue TAC, there is an early peak in the first 10 frames followed by a downward slope and an eventual plateau near zero activity in the final 28 frames. Subsequent pathologic examination confirmed the presence of malignant cells. The outcome score for this lesion was a 5. SUVmax = maximum standardized uptake value. (B) Images in a 44-year-old man (participant 4) with glioblastoma multiforme in the right temporal lobe treated with surgery, followed by chemotherapy and repeat resection showing no tumor. MRI scan (middle) shows an area of contrast enhancement concerning for progression (arrow). Static 18F-FSPG PET image (left) shows weak uptake (arrow). The lesion TAC from the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET images (right) shows a plateau line after an early uptake peak, and higher uptake values in the tumor lesion at late times when compared to background, with a slight and slow tendency to increase over time. Subsequent pathologic examination showed necrosis and reactive changes with no definite glial neoplasm. The outcome score for this lesion was a 1. (C) Images in a 77-year-old man (participant 2) with grade III unresectable anaplastic astrocytoma of the temporal lobe (postradiation therapy). Baseline MRI scan (middle) shows a lesion with two separate components, one medial (lesion 1, red arrow) and one lateral (lesion 2, green arrow). Static 18F-FSPG PET image (left) shows prominent uptake medially (SUVmax = 12), and weak uptake laterally (lesion SUVmax = 3 on whole body [WB] PET). Follow-up MRI scan (middle) obtained 4 months after baseline shows an increase in size of the medial component, while the lateral component remains stable. In the background volume of interest, the TAC on the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET scan (right) shows an exponential decaying behavior after an early uptake peak. A similar TAC pattern is seen in the lateral lesion, but with higher uptake values at late times when compared to the background volume of interest, with a slight and slow tendency to increase over time. The medial lesion shows rapidly increasing uptake over time throughout the whole duration of the dynamic PET acquisition. The slight tendency of 18F-FSPG uptake to increase in the lateral (nonenhancing) component of the tumor, and the mild uptake on the WB late scan (SUVmax = 3), suggests a “wait and watch” approach would be best for this lesion. Mild uptake indicates uptake slightly higher than surrounding background (healthy tissue). The outcome score for both lesions in this patient was a 4.
Images in a 65-year-old woman (participant 3) with non–small
cell lung cancer brain metastases. (A) Contrast-enhanced MRI scan shows a
small right frontal lesion (lesion 1, green arrow) and also an enhancing
lesion within the right central sulcus (lesion 2, red arrow), which may
represent evolving treatment effects or progression. (B) Fluorine 18
fluorodeoxyglucose PET image shows no uptake in either lesion, whereas (C)
(4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) PET image shows mild
uptake in the smaller anterior lesion and intense uptake in the bigger
posterior lesion. (D) Tissue time-activity curves from the dynamic 18F-FSPG
PET images show a plateau line after an early uptake peak in the background
volume of interest, and a similar pattern in the small right frontal lesion
(lesion 1), whereas the larger lesion in the right central sulcus (lesion 2)
shows rapidly increasing uptake over time throughout the whole duration of
the dynamic acquisition. The outcome score was 1 for lesion 1 and 2 for
lesion 2. SUV = standardized uptake value, SUVmax = maximum SUV.
Figure 2:
Images in a 65-year-old woman (participant 3) with non–small cell lung cancer brain metastases. (A) Contrast-enhanced MRI scan shows a small right frontal lesion (lesion 1, green arrow) and also an enhancing lesion within the right central sulcus (lesion 2, red arrow), which may represent evolving treatment effects or progression. (B) Fluorine 18 fluorodeoxyglucose PET image shows no uptake in either lesion, whereas (C) (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) PET image shows mild uptake in the smaller anterior lesion and intense uptake in the bigger posterior lesion. (D) Tissue time-activity curves from the dynamic 18F-FSPG PET images show a plateau line after an early uptake peak in the background volume of interest, and a similar pattern in the small right frontal lesion (lesion 1), whereas the larger lesion in the right central sulcus (lesion 2) shows rapidly increasing uptake over time throughout the whole duration of the dynamic acquisition. The outcome score was 1 for lesion 1 and 2 for lesion 2. SUV = standardized uptake value, SUVmax = maximum SUV.
Compartmental model–fitted curves for the grade 4 primary brain
tumor lesions (11 participants, 16 lesions), the non–grade 4 primary
brain tumor lesions (six participants, 11 lesions), and the brain metastases
(nine participants, 21 lesions). Error bars denote the standard error of the
mean. C1, C2, and C3 are the tracer concentrations in each tissue
compartment. Cp is the tracer concentration in the plasma or blood
compartment. K1 = rate coefficient for transfer of tracer into the
extracellular space from arterial plasma or blood compartment, k2 = rate
constant for transfer of tracer out of the extracellular space and into
arterial plasma or blood compartment, k3 = rate constant for transfer of
tracer into the cell via system xC– from the extracellular space, k4
= rate constant for transfer of tracer out of the cell and into the
extracellular space, k5 = sequestration rate constant of tracer into amino
acid pools within the cell, Ki = net influx rate constant of tracer uptake
into tissue, SUV = standardized uptake value, TAC = time-activity
curve.
Figure 3:
Compartmental model–fitted curves for the grade 4 primary brain tumor lesions (11 participants, 16 lesions), the non–grade 4 primary brain tumor lesions (six participants, 11 lesions), and the brain metastases (nine participants, 21 lesions). Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. C1, C2, and C3 are the tracer concentrations in each tissue compartment. Cp is the tracer concentration in the plasma or blood compartment. K1 = rate coefficient for transfer of tracer into the extracellular space from arterial plasma or blood compartment, k2 = rate constant for transfer of tracer out of the extracellular space and into arterial plasma or blood compartment, k3 = rate constant for transfer of tracer into the cell via system xC from the extracellular space, k4 = rate constant for transfer of tracer out of the cell and into the extracellular space, k5 = sequestration rate constant of tracer into amino acid pools within the cell, Ki = net influx rate constant of tracer uptake into tissue, SUV = standardized uptake value, TAC = time-activity curve.
Compartmental model–fitted curves for grade 4 primary brain
tumor lesions as stratified by lesion outcome (determined with follow-up MRI
and/or pathologic examination). There were 11 grade 4 lesions in the poor
lesion outcome group and five grade 4 lesions in the good lesion outcome
group. Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. K1 = rate
coefficient for transfer of tracer into the extracellular space from
arterial plasma or blood compartment, k2 = rate constant for transfer of
tracer out of the extracellular space and into arterial plasma or blood
compartment, k3 = rate constant for transfer of tracer into the cell via
system xC– from the extracellular space, k4 = rate constant for
transfer of tracer out of the cell and into the extracellular space, k5 =
sequestration rate constant of tracer into amino acid pools within the cell,
Ki = net influx rate constant of tracer uptake into tissue, SUV =
standardized uptake value, TAC = tumor-activity curve.
Figure 4:
Compartmental model–fitted curves for grade 4 primary brain tumor lesions as stratified by lesion outcome (determined with follow-up MRI and/or pathologic examination). There were 11 grade 4 lesions in the poor lesion outcome group and five grade 4 lesions in the good lesion outcome group. Error bars denote the standard error of the mean. K1 = rate coefficient for transfer of tracer into the extracellular space from arterial plasma or blood compartment, k2 = rate constant for transfer of tracer out of the extracellular space and into arterial plasma or blood compartment, k3 = rate constant for transfer of tracer into the cell via system xC from the extracellular space, k4 = rate constant for transfer of tracer out of the cell and into the extracellular space, k5 = sequestration rate constant of tracer into amino acid pools within the cell, Ki = net influx rate constant of tracer uptake into tissue, SUV = standardized uptake value, TAC = tumor-activity curve.
Box-and-whisker plots show the percentage change in
(4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-L-glutamate (18F-FSPG) influx rate constant
(Ki) and maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) for grade 4–only
lesions (A and C) and grade 4 and non–grade 4 lesions pooled together
(B and D). A plus sign (+) denotes the mean value in the box plots. The
Student t test was used for group mean comparisons.
Figure 5:
Box-and-whisker plots show the percentage change in (4S)-4-(3-[18F]fluoropropyl)-l-glutamate (18F-FSPG) influx rate constant (Ki) and maximum standardized uptake (SUVmax) for grade 4–only lesions (A and C) and grade 4 and non–grade 4 lesions pooled together (B and D). A plus sign (+) denotes the mean value in the box plots. The Student t test was used for group mean comparisons.
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is comparing
the decision measures (A, C) ΔKi and (B, D) ΔSUVmax in the
grade 4–only primary brain tumors and the entire primary brain tumor
group (grade 4 and non–grade 4 brain lesions pooled together). AUC =
area under the ROC curve, ΔKi = percentage change between the Ki value estimated using the 30-minute dynamic PET
data
and the Ki value estimated using the dynamic plus whole-body PET data. ΔSUVmax = percentage change in maximum standardized uptake
value of the brain lesion between the dynamic PET scan (last frame) and whole-body PET scan.
Figure 6:
Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analysis is comparing the decision measures (A, C) ΔKi and (B, D) ΔSUVmax in the grade 4–only primary brain tumors and the entire primary brain tumor group (grade 4 and non–grade 4 brain lesions pooled together). AUC = area under the ROC curve, ΔKi = percentage change between the Ki value estimated using the 30-minute dynamic PET data and the Ki value estimated using the dynamic plus whole-body PET data. ΔSUVmax = percentage change in maximum standardized uptake value of the brain lesion between the dynamic PET scan (last frame) and whole-body PET scan.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cha S . Neuroimaging in neuro-oncology . Neurotherapeutics 2009. ; 6 ( 3 ): 465 – 477 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson SD . Malignant gliomas: diagnosis and treatment . Dis Mon 2011. ; 57 ( 10 ): 558 – 569 . - PubMed
    1. Mabray MC , Barajas RF Jr , Cha S . Modern brain tumor imaging . Brain Tumor Res Treat 2015. ; 3 ( 1 ): 8 – 23 . - PMC - PubMed
    1. Shah AH , Snelling B , Bregy A , et al. . Discriminating radiation necrosis from tumor progression in gliomas: a systematic review what is the best imaging modality? J Neurooncol 2013. ; 112 ( 2 ): 141 – 152 . - PubMed
    1. Jung JH , Ahn BC . Current Radiopharmaceuticals for Positron Emission Tomography of Brain Tumors . Brain Tumor Res Treat 2018. ; 6 ( 2 ): 47 – 53 . - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data