Evidence that digital game players neglect age classification systems when deciding which games to play
- PMID: 35192661
- PMCID: PMC8863231
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0263560
Evidence that digital game players neglect age classification systems when deciding which games to play
Abstract
This article considers players' experiences seeking out new games to play, and their use of the Australian National Classification Scheme in doing so. The global video game industry is booming, with hundreds of games being released each month across numerous platforms. As a result, players have an unprecedented number of games available when choosing what games to purchase. However, a number of confounding issues around the emergent content of games and the subjective nature of game reviewing makes it difficult to relate what kinds of experiences a given game will facilitate. In this study, we surveyed game players in order to find their game platform and acquisition preferences; strategies and experiences when choosing games; and attitudes towards classification systems. Our findings suggest that players find it difficult to choose what games to purchase, and that existing classification systems are mostly only beneficial when choosing games for minors.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures






References
-
- Newzoo. 2020 Global Players Per Region. 2020 [cited 2021 January 18]; https://newzoo.com/key-numbers.
-
- Newzoo. 2020 Global Games Market Per Device & Segment. 2020 [cited 2021 January 18]; https://newzoo.com/key-numbers.
-
- SteamSpy. Games released in previous months. 2021 [cited 2021 January 18]; https://steamspy.com/year/.
-
- Ruggill J.E., et al.., Inside The Video Game Industry. 2017, New York: Routledge.
-
- Švelch J., Exploring the Myth of the Representative Video Game Trailer. Kinephanos: Revue d’études des médias et de culture populaire, 2017. 7(1): p. 7–36.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials