Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;36(3):217-221.
doi: 10.13201/j.issn.2096-7993.2022.03.012.

[Vestibular rehabilitation in patients with vestibular peripheral vertigo]

[Article in Chinese]
Qingjia Cui  1 , Rui Wang  1 , Jin Yan  1 , Fang Liu  1 , Na Chen  1 , Lei Zhang  1 , Feng Dai  1 , Ying Lou  1
Affiliations

[Vestibular rehabilitation in patients with vestibular peripheral vertigo]

[Article in Chinese]
Qingjia Cui et al. Lin Chuang Er Bi Yan Hou Tou Jing Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2022 Mar.

Abstract
in English, Chinese

Objective:To evaluate the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation in patients with anterior peripheral vertigo and analyze its influencing factors. Methods:From January 2018 to June 2021, 153 cases with peripheral vertigo diseases（including 47 cases of benign positional paroxysmal vertigo, 38 cases of Meniere's disease, 26 cases of sudden deafness with vertigo, 23 cases of vestibular migraine and 19 cases of vestibular neuritis） were enrolled. One hundred and three cases were treated with vestibular rehabilitation combined with drugs, and 50 cases only treated with drugs were used as controls. Self-rating scale and vertigo disorder scale were evaluated at the beginning of treatment, 4 weeks and 8 weeks, respectively. The curative effects of the two groups were tested by t-test, and the independent risk factors affecting the curative effects were analyzed by multiple linear regression. Results:There was no difference in clinical data, self-assessment scale and vertigo disorder scale between the two groups（P>0.05）. At 4 and 8 weeks, the scores of self-assessment scale and vertigo disorder scale in the experimental group were better than those in the control group（all P<0.01）, and the curative effect at 8 weeks was better than that at 4 weeks, especially the decrease of emotional score during walking and the proportion of severe vertigo disability（all P<0.01）. The scores of self-rating scale and vertigo disorder scale of the cases with benign positional paroxysmal vertigo and vestibular neuritis were better than Meniere's disease, vestibular migraine and sudden deafness with vertigo（P<0.05）. Headache（P<0.05） and severe vertigo disorder before intervention（P<0.01） were independent risk factors affecting the efficacy of vestibular rehabilitation. Conclusion:Vestibular rehabilitation combined with anti-vertigo drugs in the treatment of vestibular peripheral vertigo is better than that of only using drugs, especially in improving the degree of emotional disorder and vertigo disability. It is more suitable for benign positional paroxysmal vertigo and vestibular neuritis, while the effect of combined headache or severe vertigo is relatively poor.

目的：评价前庭外周性眩晕患者前庭康复的疗效，并分析其影响因素。 方法：收集2018年1月—2021年6月北京康复医院耳鼻咽喉科门诊确诊的前庭外周性眩晕患者153例（其中良性阵发性位置性眩晕47例，梅尼埃病38例，突发性聋伴眩晕26例，前庭性偏头痛23例，前庭神经炎19例），随机按照2∶1样本量匹配，试验组103例患者采用前庭康复联合药物治疗，对照组50例仅口服药物治疗。分别在开始治疗时、治疗4周时和治疗8周时进行自评量表和眩晕残障程度评定量表（DHI）评价，比较两组患者的疗效，同时采用多元线性回归分析影响疗效的独立危险因素。 结果：两组临床资料、自评量表和DHI评分各基线值的差异均无统计学意义（P>0.05）。4周和8周时试验组自评量表和DHI评分均优于对照组（均P<0.01），8周时疗效优于4周，尤其表现为行走时情绪得分降低和重度眩晕残障程度比例降低（均P<0.01）。同时，良性阵发性位置性眩晕和前庭神经炎患者自评量表和DHI评分优于梅尼埃病、前庭性偏头痛和突发性聋伴眩晕患者（P<0.05）。合并头痛（P<0.05）、治疗前眩晕残障程度较重（P<0.01）为影响前庭康复疗效的独立危险因素。 结论：前庭康复联合药物治疗前庭外周性眩晕的效果优于仅使用药物治疗的效果，尤其在改善情绪障碍和眩晕残障程度方面较为明显。此前庭康复方案更适于良性阵发性位置性眩晕和前庭神经炎患者，合并头痛或重度眩晕的疗效较差。.

Keywords: treatment effectiveness; vertigo; vestibular rehabilitation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors of this article and the planning committee members and staff have no relevant financial relationships with commercial interests to disclose.

Figures

图 1
图 1
两组4周时和8周时自评量表各项评分比较
图 2
图 2
两组DHI量表情绪评分比较
图 3
图 3
两组DHI眩晕残障程度比较
图 4
图 4
试验组有无合并头痛的DHI评分比较；
图 5
图 5
试验组BPPV和VN患者的DHI评分比较
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kristiansen L, Magnussen LH, Juul-Kristensen B, et al. Feasibility of integrating vestibular rehabilitation and cognitive behaviour therapy for people with persistent dizziness. Pilot Feasibility Stud. 2019;5:69. doi: 10.1186/s40814-019-0452-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Roh KJ, Kim MK, Kim JH, et al. Role of Emotional Distress in Prolongation of Dizziness: A Cross-Sectional Study. J Audiol Otol. 2017;22(1):6–12. - PMC - PubMed
    1. 刘 永胜, 朱 欣茹, 汤 勇, et al. 前庭综合征患者伴发焦虑抑郁情绪的调查. 中华耳科学杂志. 2019;17(6):818–822. doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1672-2922.2019.06.003. - DOI
    1. 徐 先荣, 杨 军. 眩晕内科诊治和前庭康复. 北京: 科学出版社; 2020. pp. 15–137.
    1. 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志编辑委员会, 中华医学会耳鼻咽喉头颈外科学分会 良性阵发性位置性眩晕诊断和治疗指南(2017) 中华耳鼻咽喉头颈外科杂志. 2017;52(3):173–177. - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources