Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul;117(7):2096-2107.
doi: 10.1111/add.15851. Epub 2022 Mar 7.

Evaluating the effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: protocol for a multi-centre cluster-randomized controlled trial in Great Britain

Sharon Cox  1   2 , Linda Bauld  2   3 , Rachel Brown  4 , Matthew Carlisle  5 , Allison Ford  6 , Peter Hajek  7 , Jinshuo Li  8 , Caitlin Notley  9 , Steve Parrott  8 , Francesca Pesola  2   7 , Deborah Robson  2   10 , Kirstie Soar  11 , Allan Tyler  11 , Emma Ward  8 , Lynne Dawkins  11
Affiliations

Evaluating the effectiveness of e-cigarettes compared with usual care for smoking cessation when offered to smokers at homeless centres: protocol for a multi-centre cluster-randomized controlled trial in Great Britain

Sharon Cox et al. Addiction. 2022 Jul.

Abstract

Background and aims: Smoking is extremely common among adults experiencing homelessness, but there is lack of evidence for treatment efficacy. E-cigarettes are an effective quitting aid, but they have not been widely tested in smokers with complex health and social needs. Here we build upon our cluster feasibility trial and evaluate the offer of an e-cigarette or usual care to smokers accessing a homeless centre.

Design, setting and participants: Multi-centre two-arm cluster-randomized controlled trial with mixed-method embedded process and economic evaluation in homeless centres in England, Scotland and Wales. Adult smokers (18+ years; n = 480) accessing homeless centres and who are known to centre staff and willing to consent.

Intervention and comparator: Clusters (n = 32) will be randomized to either an e-cigarette starter pack with weekly allocations of nicotine containing e-liquid for 4 weeks [choice of flavours (menthol, fruit and tobacco) and strengths 12 mg/ml and 18 mg/ml] or the usual care intervention, which comprises very brief advice and a leaflet signposting to the local stop smoking service.

Measurements: The primary outcome is 24-week sustained carbon monoxide-validated smoking cessation (Russell Standard defined, intention-to-treat analysis).

Secondary outcomes: (i) 50% smoking reduction (cigarettes per day) from baseline to 24 weeks; (ii) 7-day point prevalence quit rates at 4-, 12- and 24-week follow-up; (iii) changes in risky smoking practices (e.g. sharing cigarettes, smoking discarded cigarettes) from baseline to 4, 12 and 24 weeks; (iv) cost-effectiveness of the intervention; and (v) fidelity of intervention implementation; mechanisms of change; contextual influences and sustainability.

Conclusions: This is the first study, to our knowledge, to randomly assign smokers experiencing homelessness to an e-cigarette and usual care intervention to measure smoking abstinence with embedded process and economic evaluations. If effective, its results will be used to inform the larger-scale implementation of offering e-cigarettes throughout homeless centres to aid smoking cessation.

Keywords: Cessation; ENDS; e-cigarettes; harm reduction; homelessness; smoking; tobacco; usual care; vaping; very brief advice.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Flow diagram. Effects of e‐cigarettes (EC) versus usual care (UC) for smoking cessation when offered at homeless centres: a cluster‐randomized controlled trial (cRCT)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Trial logic model
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lewer D, Aldridge RW, Menezes D, Sawyer C, Zaninotto P, Dedicoat M, et al. Health‐related quality of life and prevalence of six chronic diseases in homeless and housed people: a cross‐sectional study in London and Birmingham, England. BMJ Open [internet]. 2019;9:e025192. https://bmjopen.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025192. Accessed 17th June 2021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggett TP, Chang Y, Singer DE, Porneala BC, Gaeta JM, O'Connell JJ, et al. Tobacco‐, alcohol‐, and drug‐attributable deaths and their contribution to mortality disparities in a cohort of homeless adults in Boston. Am J Public Health [internet]. 2015;105:1189–97. [cited 2021 May 24]. Available at: http://ajph.aphapublications.org/doi/10.2105/AJPH.2014.302248 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hwang SW, Wilkins R, Tjepkema M, O'Campo PJ, Dunn JR. Mortality among residents of shelters, rooming houses, and hotels in Canada: 11 year follow‐up study. BMJ [internet]. 2009;339:b4036–6. [cited 2021 May 24]. Available at: https://www.bmj.com/lookup/doi/10.1136/bmj.b4036. Accessed 17th June 2021. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Soar K, Dawkins L, Robson D, Cox S. Smoking amongst adults experiencing homelessness: A systematic review of prevalence rates, interventions and the barriers and facilitators to quitting and staying quit. J Smok Cessat [internet]. 2020;15:94–108. [cited 2020 Oct 6]. Available at: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1834261220000110/type.... Accessed 17th June 2021.
    1. Office for National Statistics (ONS). Adult smoking habits in the UK: 2019 [internet]. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulationandcommunity/healthandsocialcare/.... Accessed 17th June 2021.

Publication types

Associated data