Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jun 1;92(6):e132-e138.
doi: 10.1097/TA.0000000000003567. Epub 2022 Feb 21.

The Kampala Trauma Score: A 20-year track record

Affiliations
Review

The Kampala Trauma Score: A 20-year track record

Leah Rosenkrantz et al. J Trauma Acute Care Surg. .

Abstract

Quantifying the severity of traumatic injury has been foundational for the standardization of outcomes, quality improvement research, and health policy throughout the evolution of trauma care systems. Many injury severity scores are difficult to calculate and implement, especially in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) where human resources are limited. The Kampala Trauma Score (KTS)-a simplification of the Trauma Injury Severity Score-was developed in 2000 to accommodate these settings. Since its development, numerous instances of KTS use have been documented, but extent of adoption is unknown. More importantly, does the KTS remain useful for determining injury severity in LMICs? This review aims to better understand the legacy of the KTS and assess its strengths and weaknesses. Three databases were searched to identify scientific papers concerning the KTS. Google Scholar was searched to identify grey literature. The search returned 357 papers, of which 199 met inclusion criteria. Eighty-five studies spanning 16 countries used the KTS in clinical settings. Thirty-seven studies validated the KTS, assessing its ability to predict outcomes such as mortality or need for admission. Over 80% of these studies reported the KTS equalled or exceeded more complicated scores at predicting mortality. The KTS has stood the test of time, proving itself over the last twenty years as an effective measure of injury severity across numerous contexts. We recommend the KTS as a means of strengthening trauma systems in LMICs and suggest it could benefit high-income trauma systems that do not measure injury severity.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Feldhaus I, Carvalho M, Waiz G, Igu J, Matthay Z, Dicker R, et al. The feasibility, appropriateness, and applicability of trauma scoring systems in low and middle-income countries: a systematic review. Trauma Surg Acute Care Open . 2020;5(1):e000424.
    1. Mehmood A, Hung YW, He H, Ali S, Bachani AM. Performance of injury severity measures in trauma research: a literature review and validation analysis of studies from low-income and middle-income countries. BMJ Open . 2019;9(1):e023161.
    1. Christie SA, Hubbard AE, Callcut RA, Hameed M, Dissak-Delon FN, Mekolo D, et al. Machine learning without Borders? An adaptable tool to optimize mortality prediction in diverse clinical settings. J Trauma Acute Care Surg . 2018;85(5):921–927.
    1. Laytin AD, Dicker RA, Gerdin M, Roy N, Sarang B, Kumar V, et al. Comparing traditional and novel injury scoring systems in a US level-I trauma center: an opportunity for improved injury surveillance in low- and middle-income countries. J Surg Res . 2017;215:60–66.
    1. Weeks SR, Stevens KA, Haider AH, Efron DT, Haut ER, MacKenzie EJ, et al. A modified Kampala trauma score (KTS) effectively predicts mortality in trauma patients. Injury . 2016;47(1):125–129.

LinkOut - more resources