Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jul 1;64(7):578-592.
doi: 10.1097/JOM.0000000000002525. Epub 2022 Feb 22.

Participatory Assessment and Selection of Workforce Health Intervention Priorities for Correctional Supervisors

Alicia G Dugan  1 , Sara Namazi, Jennifer M Cavallari, Mazen El Ghaziri, Robert D Rinker, Julius C Preston, Martin G Cherniack
Affiliations

Participatory Assessment and Selection of Workforce Health Intervention Priorities for Correctional Supervisors

Alicia G Dugan et al. J Occup Environ Med. .

Abstract

Objective: A team of academics and unionized correctional supervisors collaborated to assess workforce health and determine intervention priorities using participatory methods and tools.

Methods: Correctional supervisors took a web-based survey. Univariate and bivariate tests examined attitudes/behaviors, exposures, and outcomes most strongly associated with health; risk based on rank within chain-of-command; and health behaviors amenable to change. We used a voting process tool to prioritize intervention topics.

Results: Some health behaviors and outcomes were poor (89% overweight/ obese, 41% poor-quality sleep). We also found favorable health behaviors (annual check-ups) and psychosocial conditions (meaningful work). Some health risks (excessive overtime) were not amenable to change or resisted acknowledgment (poor mental health). The team voted to develop interventions on sleep, mental health, and obesity.

Conclusions: Comprehensive health assessment informed the prioritization process, enabling the team to quickly reach consensus on intervention priorities.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest: None declared.

References

    1. Brower J. Correctional officer wellness and safety literature review. Washington, DC: US Department of Justice Office of Justice Programs Diagnostic Center; 2013.
    1. Cheek FE, Miller MDS. The experience of stress for correction officers: a double-bind theory of correctional stress. J Crim Justice. 1983;11:105–20.
    1. National Institute of Justice . Justice Stress among Probation and Parole Officers and What Can Be Done About It; 2005. Available at: https://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/205620.pdf. Accessed August 9, 2021.
    1. State of Connecticut Comptroller’s Office . Active Deceased COs 2005–2015. [Data file].
    1. Occupational Employment and Wages, May 2014: 33–3012 Correctional Officers and Jailers; 2015. Available at: http://www.bls.gov/oes/current/oes333012.htm. Accessed August 9, 2021.

Publication types