Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Incidental Discovery Versus Symptomatic Presentation
- PMID: 35195544
- DOI: 10.1097/WNO.0000000000001475
Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: Incidental Discovery Versus Symptomatic Presentation
Abstract
Background: We aim to compare the clinical characteristics, disease course and visual outcomes between Canadian patients with idiopathic intracranial hypertension (IIH) who were incidentally discovered and those who sought care due to symptoms of IIH.
Methods: Retrospective chart review of consecutive IIH patients conducted at tertiary neuro-ophthalmology clinics. Patients were divided into Group 1 (incidentally discovered disease) and Group 2 (patients seeking medical care due to symptoms of intracranial hypertension).
Results: One hundred eighty-six patients were included in the study; of which, 75 (40.3%; Group-1) were incidentally discovered and 111 presented due to symptoms of IIH (Group-2). There were no differences in proportion of females (P = 0.101), age (P = 0.450), body mass index (P = 0.386), MRI findings of empty or partially empty sella (P = 0.41), and sella grade (P = 0.704). Group-1 patients were less likely to have experienced headache (P = 0.001), transient visual obscurations (P < 0.001), and diplopia (P = 0.026) at presentation. Group-1 patients were less likely to receive medical (P < 0.001) and surgical (P = 0.004) treatment. There was no difference in proportion of patients who lost weight between the groups (P = 0.848). At baseline, Group-1 patients exhibited better visual acuity (P = 0.001), Humphrey mean deviation (P < 0.001) and retinal nerve fiber layer thickness (P < 0.001). Group-1 patients continued to have better visual acuity (P = 0.002) and Humphrey mean deviation (P < 0.001) at final follow-up.
Conclusions: A significant portion of IIH patients were incidentally discovered. This group exhibited a favorable prognosis and only a minority of these patients required treatment. The way in which patients enter the medical system may be a valuable way to risk stratify IIH patients.
Copyright © 2022 by North American Neuro-Ophthalmology Society.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors report no conflicts of interest
References
-
- Thurtell MJ. Idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Continuum (Minneap MN). 2019;25:1289–1309.
-
- McCluskey G, Doherty-Allan R, McCarron P, Loftus AM, McCarron LV, Mulholland D, McVerry F, McCarron MO. Meta-analysis and systematic review of population-based epidemiological studies in idiopathic intracranial hypertension. Eur J Neurol. 2018;25:1218–1227.
-
- Wall M, Kupersmith MJ, Kieburtz KD, Corbett JJ, Feldon SE, Friedman DI, Katz DM, Keltner JL, Schron EB, McDermott MP. The idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial: clinical profile at baseline. JAMA Neurol. 2014;71:693–701.
-
- Friedman DI, Quiros PA, Subramanian PS, Mejico LJ, Gao S, McDermott M, Wall M. Headache in idiopathic intracranial hypertension: findings from the idiopathic intracranial hypertension treatment trial. Headache. 2017;57:1195–1205.
-
- Gondi KT, Chen KS, Gratton SM. Asymptomatic versus symptomatic idiopathic intracranial hypertension in children. J Child Neurol. 2019;34:751–756.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources