Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar 1;149(3):579-584.
doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008850.

Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Affiliations

Revising Prepectoral Breast Reconstruction

Adam M Goodreau et al. Plast Reconstr Surg. .

Abstract

Prepectoral prosthetic breast reconstruction continues to gain popularity, largely due to its decreased postoperative pain, animation deformity, and operative time as compared to subpectoral reconstruction. Widespread use has led to opportunities for surgical revisions. While some techniques for submuscular reconstruction revisions, such as implant exchange and fat grafting, also apply to prepectoral revisions, others require modification for the prepectoral space. The prosthesis' unique reliance on the mastectomy flaps and acellular dermal matrix for support leads to a progressive alteration of the breast footprint, conus, envelope, and nipple-areola complex position. To date, revisions of prepectoral reconstructions have not been addressed in the literature. This article presents the senior author's (N.P.B.) techniques for (1) revising prepectoral breast reconstructions, including staged and direct-to-implant reconstructions, with a special focus on nipple-sparing reconstruction, and (2) minimizing undesirable outcomes of prepectoral reconstruction.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Apte A, Walsh M, Balaji P, Khor B, Chandrasekharan S, Chakravorty A. Single stage immediate breast reconstruction with acellular dermal matrix and implant: Defining the risks and outcomes of post-mastectomy radiotherapy. The Surgeon. 2020;18:202–207.
    1. Mitchell MP, Wagner J, Butterworth J. Subcutaneous implant-based breast reconstruction, a modern challenge in postmastectomy radiation planning. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018;8:153–156.
    1. Jones G, Antony AK. Single stage, direct to implant pre-pectoral breast reconstruction. Gland Surg. 2019;8:53–60.
    1. Wazir U, Mokbel K. The evolving role of pre-pectoral ADM-assisted approach in implant-based immediate breast reconstruction following conservative mastectomy: An overview of the literature and description of technique. In Vivo. 2018;32:1477–1480.
    1. Walia GS, Aston J, Bello R, et al. Prepectoral versus subpectoral tissue expander placement: A clinical and quality of life outcomes study. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018;6:e1731.