Incidental Pathologic Findings in Young Men with Gynecomastia
- PMID: 35196673
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000008815
Incidental Pathologic Findings in Young Men with Gynecomastia
Abstract
Background: Pathologic examination of young adult gynecomastia tissue is controversial given the low incidence of breast carcinoma in this population. The authors examined the pathologic findings in a large cohort of adolescents with gynecomastia to evaluate the need for routine tissue analysis in this population.
Methods: A retrospective review of men who underwent unilateral or bilateral mastectomy for gynecomastia at a single institution between February of 2007 and November of 2019 identified demographics, medical history, surgical characteristics, and pathologic findings. Descriptive statistics were performed.
Results: A total of 268 male patients were included. Mean age was 16.6 years. Mean body mass index was 27.8 kg/m2, and 42.5 percent of the sample was obese. The majority (83.2 percent) underwent bilateral subcutaneous mastectomy. There were no abnormal histopathologic findings in 95.1 percent. Among the 13 patients with abnormalities, eight (3 percent) had nonproliferative changes, two (0.8 percent) had proliferative changes without atypia, two (0.8 percent) had atypical ductal hyperplasia, and one (0.4 percent) had both bilateral atypical ductal hyperplasia and unilateral ductal carcinoma in situ. No patients had invasive carcinoma. The three patients with atypical ductal hyperplasia and/or ductal carcinoma in situ were obese but had no other breast cancer or gynecomastia risk factors.
Conclusions: Findings conferring potentially increased risk of developing breast cancer were identified in three male adolescents (1.2 percent). Incidence of these findings is similar between male adolescents and similarly aged female adolescents undergoing breast reduction surgery. Although worrisome pathology results are rare, too little is known about the natural history of atypical proliferation and ductal carcinoma in situ in young men to recommend against routine analysis.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Risk, IV.
Copyright © 2022 by the American Society of Plastic Surgeons.
References
-
- Nuzzi LC, Cerrato FE, Erikson CR, et al. Psychosocial impact of adolescent gynecomastia: A prospective case-control study. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:890–896.
-
- Fricke A, Lehner GM, Stark GB, Penna V. Long-term follow-up of recurrence and patient satisfaction after surgical treatment of gynecomastia. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2017;41:491–498.
-
- Lapid O, Jolink F, Meijer SL. Pathological findings in gynecomastia: Analysis of 5113 breasts. Ann Plast Surg. 2015;74:163–166.
-
- Kasielska A, Antoszewski B. Surgical management of gynecomastia: An outcome analysis. Ann Plast Surg. 2013;71:471–475.
-
- Senger JL, Chandran G, Kanthan R. Is routine pathological evaluation of tissue from gynecomastia necessary? A 15-year retrospective pathological and literature review. Plast Surg (Oakv). 2014;22:112–116.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials
