Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Dec;92(6):1527-1534.
doi: 10.1038/s41390-022-01992-2. Epub 2022 Feb 23.

Electroencephalographic studies in growth-restricted and small-for-gestational-age neonates

Affiliations
Review

Electroencephalographic studies in growth-restricted and small-for-gestational-age neonates

Nathan J Stevenson et al. Pediatr Res. 2022 Dec.

Abstract

Foetal growth restriction (FGR) and being born small for gestational age (SGA) are associated with neurodevelopmental delay. Early diagnosis of neurological damage is difficult in FGR and SGA neonates. Electroencephalography (EEG) has the potential as a tool for the assessment of brain development in FGR/SGA neonates. In this review, we analyse the evidence base on the use of EEG for the assessment of neonates with FGR or SGA. We found consistent findings that FGR/SGA is associated with measurable changes in the EEG that present immediately after birth and persist into childhood. Early manifestations of FGR/SGA in the EEG include changes in spectral power, symmetry/synchrony, sleep-wake cycling, and the continuity of EEG amplitude. Later manifestations of FGR/SGA into infancy and early childhood include changes in spectral power, sleep architecture, and EEG amplitude. FGR/SGA infants had poorer neurodevelopmental outcomes than appropriate for gestational age controls. The EEG has the potential to identify FGR/SGA infants and assess the functional correlates of neurological damage. IMPACT: FGR/SGA neonates have significantly different EEG activity compared to AGA neonates. EEG differences persist into childhood and are associated with adverse neurodevelopmental outcomes. EEG has the potential for early identification of brain impairment in FGR/SGA neonates.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no competing interests.

References

    1. Sharma D, Shastri S, Sharma P. Intrauterine growth restriction: antenatal and postnatal aspects. Clin. Med. Insights Pediatr. 2016;10:67–83. doi: 10.4137/CMPed.S40070. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gordijn SJ, et al. Consensus definition of fetal growth restriction: a Delphi procedure. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;48:333–339. doi: 10.1002/uog.15884. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Levine TA, et al. Early childhood neurodevelopment after intrauterine growth restriction: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2015;135:126–141. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-1143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arcangeli T, Thilaganathan B, Hooper R, Khan KS, Bhide A. Neurodevelopmental delay in small babies at term: a systematic review. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2012;40:267–275. doi: 10.1002/uog.11112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Salam RA, Das JK, Bhutta ZA. Impact of intrauterine growth restriction on long-term health. Curr. Opin. Clin. Nutr. Metab. Care. 2014;17:249–254. doi: 10.1097/MCO.0000000000000051. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types