Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan-Mar;14(1):1-7.
doi: 10.4103/UA.UA_163_20. Epub 2022 Jan 20.

Does ureteral access sheath have an impact on ureteral injury?

Affiliations
Review

Does ureteral access sheath have an impact on ureteral injury?

Mehmet Kazim Asutay et al. Urol Ann. 2022 Jan-Mar.

Abstract

Objective: To present a well-organized review about ureteral access sheath impact on ureteral injury.

Materials and methods: Systemic search on literature was done. Total of 3766 studies observed by two urologists and results were unified. A Prisma diagram was used for eliminating irrelevant studies and at the end of elimination process 28 studies were found eligible for this review.

Results: Not only clinical studies but also comparative experimental animal studies show that there is no significant data to claim that ureteral access sheath insertion causes more ureteral injury. Pre-stented patients were found to be at lower risk for ureteral injury. Risk of progression to ureteral injury seems to be low even if ureteral injury occurs with insertion of ureteral access sheath.

Conclusion: Summary of studies' results indicate that use of ureteral access sheath doesn't increase ureteral injury. This review may help understanding safety profile of ureteral access sheath on evidence-based level. There is not enough data to make a statement that ureteral access sheath prevents ureteral injury.

Keywords: Retrograde intrarenal surgery; ureteral access sheath; ureteral injury; ureteral stricture; ureteroscopy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

There are no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Diagram used in literature review

References

    1. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, The PG. Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses: The PRISMA Statement. PLOS Medicine. 2009;6:e1000097. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Antes G, von Elm E. [The PRISMA Statement - what should be reported about systematic reviews?] Dtsch Med Wochenschr. 2009;134:1619. - PubMed
    1. Patel N, Monga M. Ureteral access sheaths: a comprehensive comparison of physical and mechanical properties. Int Braz J Urol. 2018;44:524–35. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Gucuk A, Soyler G, Uyeturk U, Yilmaz B, Nalbant I, Gucuk S, et al. Does ureteral access sheat usage lead to permanent damage in the ureter? A placebo controlled trial in a rabbit model. Acta Cir Bras. 2018;33:408–14. - PubMed
    1. Lildal SK, Norregaard R, Andreassen KH, Christiansen FE, Jung H, Pedersen MR, et al. Ureteral Access Sheath Influence on the Ureteral Wall Evaluated by Cyclooxygenase-2 and Tumor Necrosis Factor-alpha in a Porcine Model. J Endourol. 2017;31:307–13. - PMC - PubMed