Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 28:12:775073.
doi: 10.3389/fphar.2021.775073. eCollection 2021.

Kratom Abuse Potential 2021: An Updated Eight Factor Analysis

Affiliations
Review

Kratom Abuse Potential 2021: An Updated Eight Factor Analysis

Jack E Henningfield et al. Front Pharmacol. .

Abstract

Drugs are regulated in the United States (US) by the Controlled Substances Act (CSA) if assessment of their abuse potential, including public health risks, show such control is warranted. An evaluation via the 8 factors of the CSA provides the comprehensive assessment required for permanent listing of new chemical entities and previously uncontrolled substances. Such an assessment was published for two kratom alkaloids in 2018 that the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have identified as candidates for CSA listing: mitragynine (MG) and 7-hydroxymitragynine (7-OH-MG) (Henningfield et al., 2018a). That assessment concluded the abuse potential of MG was within the range of many other uncontrolled substances, that there was not evidence of an imminent risk to public health, and that a Schedule I listing (the only option for substances that are not FDA approved for therapeutic use such as kratom) carried public health risks including drug overdoses by people using kratom to abstain from opioids. The purpose of this review is to provide an updated abuse potential assessment reviewing greater than 100 studies published since January 1, 2018. These include studies of abuse potential and physical dependence/withdrawal in animals; in-vitro receptor binding; assessments of potential efficacy treating pain and substance use disorders; pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic studies with safety-related findings; clinical studies of long-term users with various physiological endpoints; and surveys of patterns and reasons for use and associated effects including dependence and withdrawal. Findings from these studies suggest that public health is better served by assuring continued access to kratom products by consumers and researchers. Currently, Kratom alkaloids and derivatives are in development as safer and/or more effective medicines for treating pain, substances use disorders, and mood disorders. Placing kratom in the CSA via scheduling would criminalize consumers and possession, seriously impede research, and can be predicted to have serious adverse public health consequences, including potentially thousands of drug overdose deaths. Therefore, CSA listing is not recommended. Regulation to minimize risks of contaminated, adulterated, and inappropriately marketed products is recommended.

Keywords: Controlled Substances Act; abuse potential; dietary supplement; epidemiology; opioid pharmacology; safety; substance use disorder treatment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Authors JH, DW, and MH were employed by the company PinneyAssociates, Inc. Through PinneyAssociates, JH, MH, DW, and colleagues provide scientific and regulatory consulting to support new drug applications (NDAs) and risk management programs for a broad range of CNS active substances and drug products including psychedelic substances, new chemical entities, and alternative formulations and routes of delivery, as well as dietary ingredient notifications, cannabinoid assessment, and noncombustible tobacco/nicotine products for FDA regulation. This includes advising the American Kratom Association and its affiliate, the Center for Plant Science and Health, on kratom science and regulation. MH is also a Professor at Thomas Jefferson University & President, Huestis & Smith Toxicology LLC, a toxicology consulting company working with pharmaceutical & diagnostic companies. No clients had any contribution or input into this assessment or its conclusions. The reviewer WP declared a past co-authorship with one of the authors JH to the handling editor.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. American Psychiatric Association (1994). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 4th Edition. Arlington, VA: DSM-IV.
    1. American Psychiatric Association (2013). Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders. 5th Edition. Arlington, VA: DSM-5.
    1. Avery B. A., Boddu S. P., Sharma A., Furr E. B., Leon F., Cutler S. J., et al. (2019). Comparative Pharmacokinetics of Mitragynine after Oral Administration of Mitragyna Speciosa (Kratom) Leaf Extracts in Rats. Planta Med. 85 (4), 340–346. 10.1055/a-0770-3683 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Behnood-Rod A., Chellian R., Wilson R., Hiranita T., Sharma A., Leon F., et al. (2020). Evaluation of the Rewarding Effects of Mitragynine and 7-hydroxymitragynine in an Intracranial Self-Stimulation Procedure in Male and Female Rats. Drug Alcohol Depend 215, 108235. 10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2020.108235 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belouin S. J., Henningfield J. E. (2018). Psychedelics: Where We Are Now, Why We Got Here, what We Must Do. Neuropharmacology 142, 7–19. 10.1016/j.neuropharm.2018.02.018 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources