Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 24;12(4):1829-1854.
doi: 10.7150/thno.68804. eCollection 2022.

An update of label-free protein target identification methods for natural active products

Affiliations
Review

An update of label-free protein target identification methods for natural active products

Zhao Cui et al. Theranostics. .

Abstract

Natural active products (NAPs) are derived from chemical substances found in nature that have biological activity and medicinal potential. Screening and revealing the protein targets of NAPs is an indispensable link in the pharmacological and toxicological understanding of NAPs. Proteins are the main factors executing cell functions, and cells rely on the function of proteins to complete various activities in the life cycle. The important mechanism of action of drugs is to regulate cell biological activities by interacting with proteins and other macromolecules. At present, the classic way to screen protein targets is based on the molecular label tracing method, which has a long cycle and changes the molecular structure and pharmacological effects of NAPs. Due to the shortcomings of molecular labelling methods, in recent years, scientists have tried to develop a variety of label-free protein target identification methods for NAPs and have made a certain amount of progress. This article reviews the current protein target identification methods for NAPs with the aim of providing a reference for research on NAP protein targets.

Keywords: drug discovery; label-free methods; natural active products; protein stability; protein target identification.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interest exists.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Label-free target identification methods based on shifts in the thermal stability of protein targets. When the proteins are heated, their folded structures denature, and the proteins begin to aggregate. Proteins have intrinsic properties of resistance to thermal denaturation, which can be described by the Tm, the temperature when half of the proteins is denatured. Interactions between proteins and small molecules can alter their free energy and thermal stability. Label-free target identification methods based on shifts in the thermal stability of protein that include DSF, CETSA, TPP (or MS-CETSA), TS-FITGE (or 2DE-CETSA), ITDR-MS-CETSA, STPP and HCIF-CETSA.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Label-free target identification methods based on the difference in chemical denaturant-induced stability of protein targets. Proteins can be denatured by chemicals (i.e., denaturants), such as guanidine salts or urea. Denatured proteins are more susceptible to proteolysis or oxidation than intact proteins. The stability of protein to denaturants can be changed by the combination of small molecules, so as to shift the proteolytic stability and oxidation level of protein. Label-free target identification methods based on the difference in chemical denaturant-induced stability of protein that include PP, SPROX, SILAC-SPROX, SILAC-PP, PePTID, STEPP-PP and CPP.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Label-free target identification methods based on the shift in the limited proteolytic susceptibility of protein targets. The protein conformation is influenced by a variety of factors, including post-translational modifications, disease state, and ligand binding, which may alter the proteolytic susceptibility. DARTS and LiP-MS are label-free target identification methods based on the shift in the limited proteolytic susceptibility of protein.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Label-free target identification methods based on organic solvent-induced shift in the solubility of protein targets. Organic solvents are commonly used to precipitate proteins and remove contaminants. The resistance of the protein targets to organic solvent-induced denaturation and precipitation is stronger after ligand-binding events. DiffPOP and SIP are label-free target identification methods based organic solvent-induced shift in the solubility of protein.
Figure 5
Figure 5
New label-free screening strategies. UPT uses the weak molecular interaction of bait-molecule to non-covalently immobilize it on a polymeric surface to achieve target protein fishing. AS-MS is an affinity-based screening technique for the analysis of interactions between protein targets and small molecules.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Indirect screening strategies for protein targets. (A) Protein degradation methods as dTAG method; (B) Genomic library screening methods as the CRISPR genomic library screening; (C) Differential genomic screening methods and differential proteomic screening methods; (D) Phenotypic-based screening methods; (E) Bioinformatics prediction methods.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Timeline of the different label-free approaches.

References

    1. Hamilton GR, Baskett TF. In the arms of Morpheus the development of morphine for postoperative pain relief. Can J Anaesth. 2000;47:367–74. - PubMed
    1. Swann JP. The search for synthetic penicillin during World War II. Br J Hist Sci. 1983;16:154–90. - PubMed
    1. Aminov RI. A brief history of the antibiotic era: lessons learned and challenges for the future. Front Microbiol. 2010;1:134. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Li JW, Vederas JC. Drug discovery and natural products: end of an era or an endless frontier? Science. 2009;325:161–5. - PubMed
    1. Newman DJ, Cragg GM. Natural Products as Sources of New Drugs over the Nearly Four Decades from 01/1981 to 09/2019. J Nat Prod. 2020;83:770–803. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms