Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 6;6(1):zrac005.
doi: 10.1093/bjsopen/zrac005.

Global guidelines for emergency general surgery: systematic review and Delphi prioritization process

Collaborators

Global guidelines for emergency general surgery: systematic review and Delphi prioritization process

NIHR Global Research Health Unit on Global Surgery. BJS Open. .

Abstract

Background: Existing emergency general surgery (EGS) guidelines rarely include evidence from low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and may lack relevance to low-resource settings. The aim of this study was to develop global guidelines for EGS that are applicable across all hospitals and health systems.

Methods: A systematic review and thematic analysis were performed to identify recommendations relating to undifferentiated EGS. Those deemed relevant across all resource settings by an international guideline development panel were included in a four-round Delphi prioritization process and are reported according to International Standards for Clinical Practice Guidelines. The final recommendations were included as essential (baseline measures that should be implemented as a priority) or desirable (some hospitals may lack relevant resources at present but should plan for future implementation).

Results: After thematic analysis of 38 guidelines with 1396 unique recommendations, 68 recommendations were included in round 1 voting (410 respondents (219 from LMICs)). The final guidelines included eight essential, one desirable, and three critically unwell patient-specific recommendations. Preoperative recommendations included guidance on timely transfers, CT scan pathways, handovers, and discussion with senior surgeons. Perioperative recommendations included surgical safety checklists and recovery room monitoring. Postoperative recommendations included early-warning scores, discharge plans, and morbidity meetings. Recommendations for critically unwell patients included prioritization for theatre, senior team supervision, and high-level postoperative care.

Conclusion: This pragmatic and representative process created evidence-based global guidelines for EGS that are suitable for resource limited environments around the world.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
PRISMA flowchart for guidelines identified in systematic review
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Overview of global guidelines development process
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Countries represented in round 1 voting

References

    1. Forrester JA, Starr N, Negussie T, Schaps D, Adem M, Alemu S et al. Clean Cut (adaptive, multimodal surgical infection prevention programme) for low-resource settings: a prospective quality improvement study. Br J Surg 2020;108:727–734 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Fakhry SM, Trask AL, Waller MA, Watts DD. Management of brain-injured patients by an evidence-based medicine protocol improves outcomes and decreases hospital charges. J Trauma 2004;56:492–499 - PubMed
    1. Sousa AS, Ferrito C, Paiva JA. Application of a ventilator associated pneumonia prevention guideline and outcomes: a quasi-experimental study. Intensive Crit Care Nurs 2019;51:50–56 - PubMed
    1. Woolf SH, Grol R, Hutchinson A, Eccles M, Grimshaw J. Clinical guidelines: potential benefits, limitations, and harms of clinical guidelines. BMJ 1999;318:527–530 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Heneghan C, Blacklock C, Perera R, Davis R, Banerjee A, Gill P et al. Evidence for non-communicable diseases: analysis of Cochrane reviews and randomised trials by World Bank classification. BMJ Open 2013;3:e003298 - PMC - PubMed

Publication types