Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 May 1;322(5):R389-R399.
doi: 10.1152/ajpregu.00004.2022. Epub 2022 Feb 24.

No evidence for pericardial restraint in the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) following pharmacologically induced bradycardia at rest or during exercise

Affiliations

No evidence for pericardial restraint in the snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) following pharmacologically induced bradycardia at rest or during exercise

Brandt Smith et al. Am J Physiol Regul Integr Comp Physiol. .

Abstract

Most animals elevate cardiac output during exercise through a rise in heart rate (fH), whereas stroke volume (VS) remains relatively unchanged. Cardiac pacing reveals that elevating fH alone does not alter cardiac output, which is instead largely regulated by the peripheral vasculature. In terms of myocardial oxygen demand, an increase in fH is more costly than that which would incur if VS instead were to increase. We hypothesized that fH must increase because any substantial rise in VS would be constrained by the pericardium. To investigate this hypothesis, we explored the effects of pharmacologically induced bradycardia, with ivabradine treatment, on VS at rest and during exercise in the common snapping turtle (Chelydra serpentina) with intact or opened pericardium. We first showed that, in isolated myocardial preparations, ivabradine exerted a pronounced positive inotropic effect on atrial tissue but only minor effects on ventricle. Ivabradine reduced fH in vivo, such that exercise tachycardia was attenuated. Pulmonary and systemic VS rose in response to ivabradine. The rise in pulmonary VS largely compensated for the bradycardia at rest, leaving total pulmonary flow unchanged by ivabradine, although ivabradine reduced pulmonary blood flow during swimming (exercise × ivabradine interaction, P < 0.05). Although systemic VS increased, systemic blood flow was reduced by ivabradine both at rest and during exercise, despite ivabradine's potential to increase cardiac contractility. Opening the pericardium had no effect on fH, VS, or blood flows before or after ivabradine, indicating that the pericardium does not constrain VS in turtles, even during pharmacologically induced bradycardia.

Keywords: Testudines; activity; cardiovascular; ectotherm; reptile.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No conflicts of interest, financial or otherwise, are declared by the authors.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Effects of ivabradine (7.57 mg·L−1; 15 µmol·L−1) on twitch force in in vitro myocardial preparations from common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina) from atrium (A) or ventricle (B). Each preparation, either treated with ivabradine (red) just before the protocol or left untreated (black) as a control, underwent a force-frequency trial (increasing stimulation frequency in 0.3 Hz steps) before and after being treated with epinephrine (10 µmol·L−1). Mixed-effect models were used to analyze the effects of stimulation frequency, epinephrine treatment and ivabradine treatment. n = 8 female snapping turtles for each treatment. Data are means ± SE.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Effect of ivabradine on heart rate (A), pulmonary blood flow (C), and pulmonary stroke volume (B) in common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). Turtles either remained with pericardium intact (circle symbols, plain bars) or underwent surgical opening of the pericardium (square symbols, hatched bars). Resting values were measured when animals were stationary, and exercise (swim) values were taken during or immediately after an enforced 5-min swim. Animals were then treated with ivabradine (1 mg·kg−1 intra-arterial injection), and the swim protocol was repeated. Mixed-effect models were used to analyze the effects of ivabradine, pericardium opening, and exercise. n = 8 female snapping turtles for each bar. Bars show means ± SE and symbols are individual values.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Effect of ivabradine on heart rate (A), systemic blood flow (C), and systemic stroke volume (B) in common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). Turtles either remained with pericardium intact (circle symbols, plain bars) or underwent surgical opening of the pericardium (square symbols, hatched bars). Resting values were measured when animals were stationary, and exercise (swim) values were taken during or immediately after an enforced 5-min swim. Animals were then treated with ivabradine (1 mg·kg−1 intra-arterial injection), and the swim protocol was repeated. Mixed-effect models were used to analyze the effects of ivabradine, pericardium opening, and exercise. n = 8 female snapping turtles for each bar except pericardium cut open after ivabradine (both at rest and swimming) where n = 7. Bars show means ± SE and symbols are individual values.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
Effect of ivabradine on heart rate (A), total (pulmonary + systemic) blood flow (C), and total stroke volume (B) in common snapping turtles (Chelydra serpentina). Turtles either remained with pericardium intact (circle symbols, plain bars) or underwent surgical opening of the pericardium (square symbols, hatched bars). Resting values were measured when animals were stationary, and exercise (swim) values were taken during or immediately after an enforced 5-min swim. Animals were then treated with ivabradine (1 mg·kg−1 intra-arterial injection), and the swim protocol was repeated. Mixed-effect models were used to analyze the effects of ivabradine, pericardium opening, and exercise. n = 6 female snapping turtles for each bar except pericardium cut open after ivabradine (both at rest and swimming) where n = 5. Bars show means ± SE and symbols are individual values.

Similar articles

References

    1. Hedrick MS, Hancock TV, Hillman SS. Metabolism at the max: how vertebrate organisms respond to physical activity. Compr Physiol 5: 1677–1703, 2015. doi:10.1002/cphy.c130032. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Hillman SS, Hedrick MS. A meta-analysis of in vivo vertebrate cardiac performance: implications for cardiovascular support in the evolution of endothermy. J Exp Biol 218: 1143–1150, 2015. doi:10.1242/jeb.118372. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Joyce W, Wang T. What determines systemic blood flow in vertebrates? J Exp Biol 223: jeb215335, 2020. doi:10.1242/jeb.215335. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Wang T, Joyce W, Hicks JW. Similitude in the cardiorespiratory responses to exercise across vertebrates. Curr Opin Physiol 10: 137–145, 2019. doi:10.1016/j.cophys.2019.05.007. - DOI
    1. Bada AA, Svendsen JH, Secher NH, Saltin B, Mortensen SP. Peripheral vasodilatation determines cardiac output in exercising humans: insight from atrial pacing. J Physiol 590: 2051–2060, 2012. doi:10.1113/jphysiol.2011.225334. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources