Totally implantable venous access ports: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures
- PMID: 35200052
- DOI: 10.1177/02683555211069772
Totally implantable venous access ports: A systematic review and meta-analysis comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures
Abstract
Background: Totally implantable venous access port (TIVAP) is a completely closed intravenous infusion system that stays in the human body for a long time. It is used for the infusion of strong irritating or hyperosmotic drugs, nutritional support treatment, blood transfusion and blood specimen collection, and other purposes. There are two common ways of TIVAP: internal jugular vein implantation and subclavian vein implantation. However, the postoperative complications of the two implantation methods are quite different, and there is no recommended implantation method in the relevant guidelines. Therefore, we conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the difference in complications of the two implantation methods, and choose the better implantation method.
Methods: Computer search in PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library database was conducted for randomized controlled trials (RCTs) from the establishment of the database to October 2021. Two researchers independently screened the literature according to the inclusion and exclusion criteria, extracted data, and evaluated the risk of bias in the included studies. RevMan5.4 software was used for meta-analysis.
Results: A total of 1086 patients in five studies were finally included. The results of meta-analysis showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of infection (RR = 0.80, 95% CI: 0.43-1.48, p = .47), catheter blockage (RR = 0.72, 95% CI: 0.15-3.46, p = .68), port squeeze (RR = 1.07, 95% CI: 0.14-8.02, p = .95), catheter-related thrombosis (RR = 0.86, 95% CI: 0.22-3.38, p = 0.83), catheter displacement (RR = 0.50, 95% CI: 0.22-1.12, p = .09), extravasation (RR = 0.12, 95% CI: 0.01-2.15, p = .15), and catheter rupture (RR = 3.77, 95% CI: 0.16-89.76, p = .41) between the two implantation paths.
Conclusions: There is little difference in the complication rate of TIVAP between internal jugular vein insertion and subclavian vein insertion. Due to the small number of included studies, there are certain limitations, and more studies need to be included for analysis in the future.
Keywords: Totally implantable venous access port; complications; internal jugular vein; meta-analysis; subclavian vein.
Similar articles
-
Comparing internal jugular vein and subclavian vein for central venous insertion of implantable ports in cancer chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of RCTs.Front Oncol. 2025 May 26;15:1566757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566757. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40492120 Free PMC article.
-
Totally implantable venous access ports: A prospective randomized study comparing subclavian and internal jugular vein punctures in children.J Pediatr Surg. 2021 Feb;56(2):317-323. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.04.021. Epub 2020 May 6. J Pediatr Surg. 2021. PMID: 32467037 Clinical Trial.
-
Late complications associated with totally implantable venous access port implantation via the internal jugular vein.Support Care Cancer. 2020 Jun;28(6):2761-2768. doi: 10.1007/s00520-019-05122-3. Epub 2019 Nov 14. Support Care Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31724073
-
[Surgical complications of totally implantable venous access port in children with malignant tumors].Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022 Dec 18;54(6):1167-1171. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2022.06.018. Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2022. PMID: 36533350 Free PMC article. Chinese.
-
Insertion site of central venous catheter among hospitalized adult patients: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 29;9:960135. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.960135. eCollection 2022. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022. PMID: 36106316 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Clinical Effect of Modified Ultrasound-Guided Subclavian Vein Puncture.Int J Clin Pract. 2023 Jul 6;2023:5534451. doi: 10.1155/2023/5534451. eCollection 2023. Int J Clin Pract. 2023. PMID: 37457808 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Psychological experiences and needs of tumor patients with implanted intravenous infusion ports: a qualitative study.Front Oncol. 2024 May 16;14:1392416. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1392416. eCollection 2024. Front Oncol. 2024. PMID: 38817894 Free PMC article.
-
Comparing internal jugular vein and subclavian vein for central venous insertion of implantable ports in cancer chemotherapy: a meta-analysis of RCTs.Front Oncol. 2025 May 26;15:1566757. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2025.1566757. eCollection 2025. Front Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40492120 Free PMC article.
-
Tunneled Hemodialysis Catheter Insertion: Technical and Clinical Considerations.Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022 Dec 7;33(1):76-79. doi: 10.1055/s-0042-1758877. eCollection 2023 Jan. Indian J Radiol Imaging. 2022. PMID: 36855721 Free PMC article. Review.
-
The utilization of guidewires for adjusting the intraoperative catheter malposition during the venous access port implantation: A retrospective study.Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Nov 8;103(45):e40461. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000040461. Medicine (Baltimore). 2024. PMID: 39533627 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources