Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 19;29(2):439-454.
doi: 10.3390/curroncol29020040.

Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review

Affiliations

Models of Follow-Up Care and Secondary Prevention Measures for Survivors of Colorectal Cancer: Evidence-Based Guidelines and Systematic Review

Jacqueline Galica et al. Curr Oncol. .

Abstract

Objective: To provide recommendations for preferred models of follow-up care for stage I-IV colorectal (CRC) cancer survivors in Ontario; to identify signs and symptoms of potential recurrence and when to investigate; and to evaluate patient information and support needs during the post-treatment survivorship period.

Methods: Consistent with the Program in Evidence-Based Medicine's standardized approach, MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, Cochrane Library, and PROSPERO databases were systematically searched. The authors drafted recommendations and revised them based on the comments from internal and external reviewers.

Results: Four guidelines, three systematic reviews, three randomized controlled trials, and three cohort studies provided evidence to develop recommendations.

Conclusions: Colorectal cancer follow-up care is complex and requires multidisciplinary, coordinated care delivered by the cancer specialist, primary care provider, and allied health professionals. While there is limited evidence to support a shared care model for follow-up, this approach is deemed to be best suited to meet patient needs; however, the roles and responsibilities of care providers need to be clearly defined, and patients need to know when and how to contact them. Although there is insufficient evidence to recommend any individual or combination of signs or symptoms as strong predictor(s) of recurrence, patients should be educated about these and know which care provider to contact if they develop any new or concerning symptoms. Psychosocial support and empathetic, effective, and coordinated communication are most valued by patients for their post-treatment follow-up care. Continuing professional education should emphasize the importance of communication skills and coordination of communication between the patient, family, and healthcare providers.

Keywords: colorectal cancer; follow-up; support needs; surveillance; survivorship.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA Flow Diagram.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Brenner D.R., Weir H.K., Demers A.A., Ellison L.F., Louzado C., Shaw A., Turner D., Woods R.R., Smith L.M. Projected estimates of cancer in Canada in 2020. CMAJ. 2020;192:E199–E205. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.191292. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jeffery M., Hickey B.E., Hider P.N. Follow-up strategies for patients treated for non- metastatic colorectal cancer. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2019;9:CD002200. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002200.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Stein K.D., Syrjala K.L., Andrykowski M.A. Physical and psychological long-term and late effects of cancer. Cancer. 2008;112((Suppl. S11)):2577–2592. doi: 10.1002/cncr.23448. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Vu J.V.-T., Matusko N., Hendren S., Regenbogen S.E., Hardiman K.M. Patient-Reported Unmet Needs in Colorectal Cancer Survivors After Treatment for Curative Intent. Dis. Colon. Rectum. 2019;62:815–822. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000001326. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Browman G.P., Levine M.N., Mohide E.A., Hayward R.S., Pritchard K.I., Gafni A., Laupacis A. The practice guidelines development cycle: A conceptual tool for practice guidelines development and implementation. J. Clin. Oncol. 1995;13:502–512. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1995.13.2.502. - DOI - PubMed