Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 21;20(2):92.
doi: 10.3390/md20020092.

Seaweed Extracts: A Promising Source of Antibiofilm Agents with Distinct Mechanisms of Action against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Affiliations

Seaweed Extracts: A Promising Source of Antibiofilm Agents with Distinct Mechanisms of Action against Pseudomonas aeruginosa

Maya Rima et al. Mar Drugs. .

Abstract

The organization of bacteria in biofilms is one of the adaptive resistance mechanisms providing increased protection against conventional treatments. Thus, the search for new antibiofilm agents for medical purposes, especially of natural origin, is currently the object of much attention. The objective of the study presented here was to explore the potential of extracts derived from three seaweeds: the green Ulva lactuca, the brown Stypocaulon scoparium, and the red Pterocladiella capillacea, in terms of their antibiofilm activity against P. aeruginosa. After preparation of extracts by successive maceration in various solvents, their antibiofilm activity was evaluated on biofilm formation and on mature biofilms. Their inhibition and eradication abilities were determined using two complementary methods: crystal violet staining and quantification of adherent bacteria. The effect of active extracts on biofilm morphology was also investigated by epifluorescence microscopy. Results revealed a promising antibiofilm activity of two extracts (cyclohexane and ethyl acetate) derived from the green alga by exhibiting a distinct mechanism of action, which was supported by microscopic analyses. The ethyl acetate extract was further explored for its interaction with tobramycin and colistin. Interestingly, this extract showed a promising synergistic effect with tobramycin. First analyses of the chemical composition of extracts by GC-MS allowed for the identification of several molecules. Their implication in the interesting antibiofilm activity is discussed. These findings suggest the ability of the green alga U. lactuca to offer a promising source of bioactive candidates that could have both a preventive and a curative effect in the treatment of biofilms.

Keywords: Pseudomonas aeruginosa; Ulva lactuca; anti-biofilm; biofilm-matrix; seaweed extracts; synergistic activity.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare they have no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Effect of different algal extracts (50.0 µg/mL) on PAO1 biofilm formation, assessed using the CV staining method. Extracts were added at t0 to evaluate their effect on biofilm formation and growth. Results are expressed as the inhibition percentage (IPCV %) mean ± SD, from three independent experiments. CH, DCM, EA, and MeOH are cyclohexane, dichloromethane, ethyl acetate, and methanol extracts, respectively. Statistically significant difference (**, p-value < 0.01, ***, p-value < 0.001) between the extract and the related untreated control is indicated.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Epifluorescence microscopy images of PAO1 biofilms incubated in MBB medium at 37 °C for 24 h without extract (control) or with one of the two active extracts (cyclohexane or ethyl acetate extract) of the green alga U. lactuca at 50.0 μg/mL. Extracts were added at t0. Biofilms were stained with Syto9 for cells (green-fluorescent), with concanavalin A for the matrix sugars (red-fluorescent), and with Syto9 and propidium iodide (PI) to differentiate live and damaged cells, respectively. U.l (CH) and U.l (EA) are cyclohexane and ethyl acetate extract, respectively, derived from the green alga U. lactuca. (Magnification: ×20).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Effect of selected algal extracts (50.0 µg/mL) on PAO1 24 h-old biofilm assessed using the CV staining method. Extracts were added at t24h to evaluate their effect on 24 h-old biofilms. Results are expressed as the eradication percentage mean ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistically significant difference (*, p-value < 0.05, **, p-value < 0.01, ***, p-value < 0.001) between the extract and the related untreated control is indicated. ND: not determined.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Effect of the U. lactuca EA extract (50.0 μg/mL) on PAO1 24 h-formed biofilm using the CFU counting assay. Both adherent and planktonic bacteria were quantified (CFU counts) after 24 h incubation in the MBB medium. Results are expressed as mean (log CFU/mL) ± SD from three independent experiments. Statistically significant difference (**, p-value < 0.01) between extract and control is indicated. EA: ethyl acetate extract. NS: not significant.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Synergistic effect of the U. lactuca EA extract (50.0 µg/mL) and tobramycin (2 µg/mL) and colistin (16 µg/mL) on PAO1 biofilms using the CFU counting assay method. The EA extract was added at t0. The EA extract/antibiotic combination was added after 24 h of incubation at 37 °C as antibiotics alone. Results are expressed as means of log reduction in comparison with the related untreated control (log reduction (log CFU/mL) ± SD) from three independent experiments. Statistically significant differences (**, p-value < 0.01, ***, p-value < 0.001) between the log CFU/mL number remaining after treatment with the EA extract/antibiotic combination or with the antibiotics alone and that in the appropriate untreated control are indicated. Statistically significant difference (*, p-value < 0.05) between the log CFU/mL number remaining after treatment with the EA extract/antibiotic combination vs. antibiotic alone. NS: not significant.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Paul D., Gopal J., Kumar M., Manikandan M. Nature to the natural rescue: Silencing microbial chats. Chem.-Biol. Interact. 2018;280:86–98. doi: 10.1016/j.cbi.2017.12.018. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Woolhouse M., Farrar J. Policy: An intergovernmental panel on antimicrobial resistance. Nature. 2014;509:555–557. doi: 10.1038/509555a. - DOI - PubMed
    1. WHO . Global Priority List of Antibiotic-Resistant Bacteria to Guide Research, Discovery, and Develipment of New Antibiotics. World Health Organization; Geneva, Switzerland: 2017.
    1. Moradali M.F., Ghods S., Rehm B.H.A. Pseudomonas aeruginosa Lifestyle: A Paradigm for Adaptation, Survival, and Persistence. Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol. 2017;7:39. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2017.00039. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Khan F., Pham D.T.N., Tabassum N., Oloketuyi S.F., Kim Y.M. Treatment strategies targeting persister cell formation in bacterial pathogens. Crit. Rev. Microbiol. 2020;46:665–688. doi: 10.1080/1040841X.2020.1822278. - DOI - PubMed

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources