Overcoming the Crisis of the Reviewing Process: Responsibility of a Scientific Journal
- PMID: 35202208
- PMCID: PMC8877864
- DOI: 10.3390/tomography8010043
Overcoming the Crisis of the Reviewing Process: Responsibility of a Scientific Journal
Abstract
Manuscript reviewers and the accuracy of the review process are fundamental to the quality of a scientific journal [...].
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare no conflict of interest.
Similar articles
-
[Reviewing an article for Radiología: who and how].Radiologia. 2011 Sep-Oct;53(5):399-405. doi: 10.1016/j.rx.2011.06.002. Epub 2011 Sep 14. Radiologia. 2011. PMID: 21924445 Spanish.
-
Quality science and quality assurance: observations of an environmental scientist.Qual Assur. 1999 Oct-Dec;7(4):225-35. doi: 10.1080/105294199750061344. Qual Assur. 1999. PMID: 11191123
-
Reviewers' perceptions of the peer review process for a medical education journal.Med Educ. 2005 Jan;39(1):90-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2929.2004.02026.x. Med Educ. 2005. PMID: 15612905
-
[The reviewers' review].Harefuah. 2006 Aug;145(8):587-91, 630. Harefuah. 2006. PMID: 16983843 Review. Hebrew.
-
The ethics of peer and editorial requests for self-citation of their work and journal.Med J Armed Forces India. 2017 Apr;73(2):181-183. doi: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2016.11.008. Epub 2016 Dec 24. Med J Armed Forces India. 2017. PMID: 28924321 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
The Peer Review Crisis Demands Radical Reform: Why Reviewers Should Become Paid Professional Referees.Cureus. 2025 Jul 13;17(7):e87817. doi: 10.7759/cureus.87817. eCollection 2025 Jul. Cureus. 2025. PMID: 40799859 Free PMC article.
-
Authors, Reviewers and Nonfinancial Conflict of Interest: Can We Manage This Bond?Tomography. 2023 Feb 17;9(1):436-438. doi: 10.3390/tomography9010035. Tomography. 2023. PMID: 36828387 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Kliewer M.A., DeLong D.M., Freed K., Jenkins C.B., Paulson E.K., Provenzale J.M. Peer review at the American Journal of Roentgenology: How the reviewer and manuscript characteristics affected editorial decisions on 196 major papers. Am. J. Roentgenol. 2004;183:1545–1550. doi: 10.2214/ajr.183.6.01831545. - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources