Comparative diagnostic utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing, GeneXpert, modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and culture using cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis: A multi-center, retrospective study in China
- PMID: 35202495
- PMCID: PMC8993600
- DOI: 10.1002/jcla.24307
Comparative diagnostic utility of metagenomic next-generation sequencing, GeneXpert, modified Ziehl-Neelsen staining, and culture using cerebrospinal fluid for tuberculous meningitis: A multi-center, retrospective study in China
Abstract
Background: Early diagnosis of tuberculosis meningitis (TBM) remains a great challenge during clinical practice. The diagnostic efficacies of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF)-based mycobacterial growth indicator tube (MGIT) culture, modified Ziehl-Neelsen (ZN) staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS) for TBM remained elusive.
Methods: A total of 216 adult patients with suspicious TBM were retrospectively enrolled in this multi-cohort study. The diagnostic performances for MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS using CSF samples were evaluated.
Results: Uniform clinical case definition classified 88 (40.7%) out of 216 patients as the definite TBM, 5 (2.3%) patients as probable TBM cases, and 24 (11.1%) patients as possible TBM cases. The sensitivities of MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS for TBM diagnosis against consensus uniform case definition for definite TBM were 25.0%, 76.1%, 73.9%, and 84.1%, respectively. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were 66.0%, 85.9%, 84.8%, and 90.1%, respectively. The sensitivities of MGIT, modified ZN staining, Xpert MTB/RIF, and mNGS for TBM diagnosis against consensus uniform case definition for definite, probable, and possible TBM were 18.8%, 57.3%, 55.5%, and 63.2%, respectively. Negative predictive values (NPVs) were 51.0%, 66.4%, 65.6%, and 69.7%, respectively. mNGS combined with modified ZN stain and Xpert could cover TBM cases against a composite microbiological reference standard, yielding 100% specificity and 100% NPV.
Conclusion: Metagenomic next-generation sequencing detected TBM with higher sensitivity than Xpert, ZN staining and MGIT culture, but mNGS cannot be used as a rule-out test. mNGS combined with Xpert or modified ZN staining could enhance the sensitivity of diagnostic tests for TBM.
Keywords: diagnostic efficacy; metagenomic next-generation sequencing; tuberculous meningitis.
© 2022 The Authors. Journal of Clinical Laboratory Analysis published by Wiley Periodicals LLC.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declared that they have no potential conflicts of interest.
Figures


Similar articles
-
Improving the microbiological diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: A prospective, international, multicentre comparison of conventional and modified Ziehl-Neelsen stain, GeneXpert, and culture of cerebrospinal fluid.J Infect. 2018 Dec;77(6):509-515. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2018.09.003. Epub 2018 Sep 12. J Infect. 2018. PMID: 30217659 Free PMC article.
-
Metagenomic Next-Generation Sequencing (mNGS) in cerebrospinal fluid for rapid diagnosis of Tuberculosis meningitis in HIV-negative population.Int J Infect Dis. 2020 Jul;96:270-275. doi: 10.1016/j.ijid.2020.04.048. Epub 2020 Apr 24. Int J Infect Dis. 2020. PMID: 32339718
-
Diagnostic usefulness of Xpert MTB/RIF assay for detection of tuberculous meningitis using cerebrospinal fluid.J Infect. 2017 Aug;75(2):125-131. doi: 10.1016/j.jinf.2017.04.010. Epub 2017 May 10. J Infect. 2017. PMID: 28501491
-
Diagnostic accuracy of Xpert MTB/RIF for tuberculous meningitis: systematic review and meta-analysis.Trop Med Int Health. 2021 Feb;26(2):122-132. doi: 10.1111/tmi.13525. Epub 2020 Nov 30. Trop Med Int Health. 2021. PMID: 33164243 Free PMC article.
-
Pooled analysis of the Xpert MTB/RIF assay for diagnosing tuberculous meningitis.Biosci Rep. 2020 Jan 31;40(1):BSR20191312. doi: 10.1042/BSR20191312. Biosci Rep. 2020. PMID: 31778149 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Using cerebrospinal fluid nanopore sequencing assay to diagnose tuberculous meningitis: a retrospective cohort study in China.BMJ Open. 2024 Jun 11;14(6):e080904. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-080904. BMJ Open. 2024. PMID: 38862231 Free PMC article.
-
Validation of mNGS results using extensive lab and clinical data.BMC Microbiol. 2025 Mar 28;25(1):173. doi: 10.1186/s12866-025-03908-6. BMC Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40155846 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a diagnostic model for tuberculous meningitis based on laboratory data.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 May 20;15:1579827. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2025.1579827. eCollection 2025. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 40463505 Free PMC article.
-
The diagnosis of tuberculous meningitis: advancements in new technologies and machine learning algorithms.Front Microbiol. 2023 Oct 24;14:1290746. doi: 10.3389/fmicb.2023.1290746. eCollection 2023. Front Microbiol. 2023. PMID: 37942080 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Application of metagenomic next-generation sequencing in the diagnosis of post-stroke infections: a case series study using multiple sample types.Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025 Jan 8;14:1386377. doi: 10.3389/fcimb.2024.1386377. eCollection 2024. Front Cell Infect Microbiol. 2025. PMID: 39844841 Free PMC article.
References
-
- World Health Organization . Global Tuberculosis Report, 20th ed. Geneva: World Health Organization; 2015.
-
- Garcia‐Monco JC. Central nervous system tuberculosis. Neurol Clin. 1999;17(4):737‐759. - PubMed
-
- Gupta R, Talwar P, Talwar P, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of nucleic acid amplification based assays for tuberculous meningitis: a meta‐analysis. J Infect. 2018;77(4):302‐313. - PubMed
-
- Wilkinson RJ, Rohlwink U, Misra UK, et al. Tuberculous meningitis. Nat Rev Neurol. 2017;13(10):581‐598. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources