Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation

Relationship of SARS-CoV-2 Antigen and Reverse Transcription PCR Positivity for Viral Cultures

Dustin W Currie et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

We assessed the relationship between antigen and reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) test positivity and successful virus isolation. We found that antigen test results were more predictive of virus recovery than RT-PCR results. However, virus was isolated from some antigen-negative and RT-PCR‒positive paired specimens, providing support for the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention antigen testing algorithm.

Keywords: COVID-19; SARS-CoV-2; coronavirus disease; coronaviruses; cycle threshold; rapid antigen test; respiratory infections; reverse transcription PCR; severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2; viral cultures; viruses; zoonoses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Box plots of Ct values among participants with recoverable virus who had concordant positive SARS-CoV-2 RT-PCR and antigen test results (A) compared with those who had positive RT-PCR and negative antigen test results (B), Winnebago County, Wisconsin, USA, November–December 2020. The difference between the 2 groups was significant (p<0.0001). Diamonds indicate means, boxes indicate the first quartile through the third quartile, horizontal bars in boxes indicate medians, and errors bars indicate minimum values to maximum values; outliers are plotted as individual circles. Ct, cycle threshold; RT-PCR, reverse transcription PCR; SARS-CoV-2, severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2.

References

    1. Shah MM, Salvatore PP, Ford L, Kamitani E, Whaley MJ, Mitchell K, et al. Performance of repeat BinaxNOW SARS-CoV-2 antigen testing in a community setting, Wisconsin, November‒December 2020. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73(Suppl 1):S54–7. 10.1093/cid/ciab309 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Prince-Guerra JL, Almendares O, Nolen LD, Gunn JKL, Dale AP, Buono SA, et al. Evaluation of Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test for SARS-CoV-2 infection at two community-based testing sites—Pima County, Arizona, November 3–17, 2020. MMWR Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2021;70:100–5. 10.15585/mmwr.mm7003e3 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pollock NR, Jacobs JR, Tran K, Cranston AE, Smith S, O’Kane CY, et al. Performance and implementation evaluation of the Abbott BinaxNOW rapid antigen test in a high throughput drive-through community testing site in Massachusetts. J Clin Microbiol. 2021;59:e00083–21. 10.1128/JCM.00083-21 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Pilarowski G, Marquez C, Rubio L, Peng J, Martinez J, Black D, et al. Field performance and public health response using the BinaxNOWTM rapid SARS-CoV-2 antigen detection assay during community-based testing. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;73:e3098–1. 10.1093/cid/ciaa1890 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Jefferson T, Spencer EA, Brassey J, Heneghan C. Viral cultures for COVID-19 infectious potential assessment: a systematic review. Clin Infect Dis. 2020;•••: Epub ahead of print. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances