True Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms with High Risk of Rupture despite Very Small Diameter
- PMID: 35203114
- PMCID: PMC8918250
- DOI: 10.3340/jkns.2021.0070
True Posterior Communicating Artery Aneurysms with High Risk of Rupture despite Very Small Diameter
Abstract
Objective: This retrospective study investigated the clinical and angiographic characteristics of ruptured true posterior communicating artery (PCoA) aneurysms in comparison with junctional PCoA aneurysms presenting with a subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Methods: The medical records and radiological data of 93 consecutive patients who underwent three-dimensional rotational angiography and surgical or endovascular treatment for a ruptured junctional or true PCoA aneurysm over an 8-year period were examined.
Results: The maximum diameter of the ruptured true PCoA aneurysm (n=13, 14.0%) was significantly smaller than that of the ruptured junctional PCoA aneurysms (n=80, 4.45±1.44 vs. 7.68±3.36 mm, p=0.001). In particular, the incidence of very small aneurysms <4 mm was 46.2% (six of 13 patients) in the ruptured true PCoA aneurysm group, yet only 2.5% (two of 80 patients) in the ruptured junctional PCoA aneurysm group. Meanwhile, the diameter of the PCoA was significantly larger in the true PCoA aneurysm group than that in the junctional PCoA aneurysm group (1.90±0.57 vs. 1.15±0.49 mm, p<0.001). In addition, the ipsilateral PCoA/P1 ratio was significantly larger in the true PCoA aneurysm group than that in the group of a junctional PCoA aneurysm (mean PCoA/P1 ratio±standard deviation, 2.67±1.22 vs. 1.14±0.88; p<0.001). No between-group difference was identified for the modified Fisher grade, clinical grade at admission, and 3-month modified Rankin Scale score.
Conclusion: A true PCoA aneurysm was found to be associated with a larger PCoA and ruptured at a smaller diameter than a junctional PCoA aneurysm. In particular, the incidence of a ruptured aneurysm with a very small diameter <4 mm was significantly higher among the patients with a true PCoA aneurysm.
Keywords: Internal carotid artery; Intracranial aneurysm; Subarachnoid hemorrhage.
Conflict of interest statement
Jaechan Park has been editorial board of JKNS since November 2014. He was not involved in the review process of this original article. No other potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.
Figures

References
-
- Backes D, Vergouwen MD, Velthuis BK, van der Schaaf IC, Bor AS, Algra A, et al. Difference in aneurysm characteristics between ruptured and unruptured aneurysms in patients with multiple intracranial aneurysms. Stroke. 2014;45:1299–1303. - PubMed
-
- Björkman J, Frösen J, Tähtinen O, Backes D, Huttunen T, Harju J, et al. Irregular shape identifies ruptured intracranial aneurysm in subarachnoid hemorrhage patients with multiple aneurysms. Stroke. 2017;48:1986–1989. - PubMed
-
- Fung C, Mavrakis E, Filis A, Fischer I, Suresh M, Tortora A, et al. Anatomical evaluation of intracranial aneurysm rupture risk in patients with multiple aneurysms. Neurosurg Rev. 2019;42:539–547. - PubMed
-
- Guo J, Chen Q, Miao H, Feng H, Zhu G, Chen Z. True posterior communicating artery aneurysms with or without increased flow dynamical stress: report of three cases. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2014;116:93–95. - PubMed
-
- He W, Gandhi CD, Quinn J, Karimi R, Prestigiacomo CJ. True aneurysms of the posterior communicating artery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data. World Neurosurg. 2011;75:64–72. discussion 49. - PubMed
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources