Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 2;12(2):245.
doi: 10.3390/biom12020245.

Differences According to Age in the Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Biomarkers to Predict Frailty in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Affiliations

Differences According to Age in the Diagnostic Performance of Cardiac Biomarkers to Predict Frailty in Patients with Acute Heart Failure

Lara Aguilar-Iglesias et al. Biomolecules. .

Abstract

Frailty has traditionally been studied in the elderly population but scarcely in younger individuals. The objective of the present study is to analyze differences according to age in the diagnostic performance of cardiac biomarkers to predict frailty in patients admitted to the hospital for acute heart failure (AHF). A frailty assessment was performed with the SPPB and FRAIL scales (score > 3). We included 201 patients who were divided according to age: those older and younger than 75 years. In the younger group, no biomarker was related to the presence of frailty. This was mainly determined by age and comorbidities. In the elderly group, NT-proBNP was significantly related to the presence of frailty, but none of the baseline characteristics were. The best cut-off point in the elderly group for NT-proBNP was 4000 pg/mL. The area under the curve (AUC) for proBNP for frailty detection was 0.62 in the elderly. Another similar frailty scale, the SPPB, also showed a similar AUC in this group; however, adding the NT-proBNP (one point if NT-proBNP < 4000 pg/mL), it showed a slightly higher yield (AUC 0.65). The addition of biomarkers could improve frailty detection in members of the elderly population who are admitted to the hospital for AHF.

Keywords: NT-proBNP; biomarkers; elderly; frailty; heart failure.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
ROC curve showing the diagnostic performance of the SPPB (dashed green line) and the modified-SPPB (continuous red line) scale to detect frailty defined as FRAIL score > 3 in the older group of patients.

References

    1. Roger V.L. Epidemiology of Heart Failure. Circ. Res. 2013;113:646–659. doi: 10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.113.300268. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McDonagh T.A., Metra M., Adamo M., Gardner R.S., Baumbach A., Böhm M., Burri H., Butler J., Čelutkienė J., Chioncel O., et al. 2021 ESC Guidelines for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Acute and Chronic Heart Failure. Eur. Heart J. 2021;42:3599–3726. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehab368. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vitale C., Jankowska E., Hill L., Piepoli M., Doehner W., Anker S.D., Lainscak M., Jaarsma T., Ponikowski P., Rosano G.M.C., et al. Heart Failure Association of the European Society of Cardiology Position Paper on Frailty in Patients with Heart Failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2019;21:1299–1305. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.1611. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Vidán M.T., Blaya-Novakova V., Sánchez E., Ortiz J., Serra-Rexach J.A., Bueno H. Prevalence and Prognostic Impact of Frailty and Its Components in Non-Dependent Elderly Patients with Heart Failure. Eur. J. Heart Fail. 2016;18:869–875. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.518. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fried L.P., Tangen C.M., Walston J., Newman A.B., Hirsch C., Gottdiener J., Seeman T., Tracy R., Kop W.J., Burke G., et al. Frailty in Older Adults: Evidence for a Phenotype. J. Gerontol. A Biol. Sci. Med. Sci. 2001;56:M146–M156. doi: 10.1093/gerona/56.3.M146. - DOI - PubMed