Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Jan 28;11(2):207.
doi: 10.3390/biology11020207.

Ecocultural or Biocultural? Towards Appropriate Terminologies in Biocultural Diversity

Affiliations

Ecocultural or Biocultural? Towards Appropriate Terminologies in Biocultural Diversity

F Merlin Franco. Biology (Basel). .

Abstract

Biocultural diversity has made notable contributions that have furthered our understanding of the human culture-nature interrelationship. However, the usage of the term 'biocultural' is not unique to biocultural diversity. It was first used in biocultural studies within anthropology decades ahead of biocultural diversity. The existing literature on biocultural diversity does not acknowledge the prior existence of biocultural studies, or provide a clear demarcation between usages of the two terms. In this article, I discuss the varying contexts in usage of the term 'biocultural' between biocultural diversity and biocultural anthropology. While biocultural diversity deals with the linkages between biological, cultural, and linguistic diversity, biocultural studies in anthropology deal with the deterministic influence of physical and social environment on human biology and wellbeing. In biocultural studies, 'biocultural' refers to the integration of methodically collated cultural data with biological and environmental data. 'Bio' in biocultural anthropology therefore denotes biology, unlike biocultural diversity where it refers to biodiversity. Both biocultural studies and biocultural diversity apply 'biocultural' as descriptor to generate overlapping terminologies such as 'biocultural approach'. Such a confusing scenario is not in the interest of biocultural diversity, as it would impede theoretical advancements. I propose that advocates of biocultural diversity explore its harmonies with ecoculturalism and the possibilities of suitably adapting the term 'ecoculture' in lieu of 'bioculture'. Using 'ecocultural' instead of 'biocultural' as a descriptor to coin terminologies could solve confusions arising from the expanding usage of the term 'bioculture'.

Keywords: biocultural anthropology; biocultural diversity; biocultural studies; cultural diversity; cultural studies; ecocultural studies; ecoculture; environment; environmental studies; probabilism.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Maffi L. Biocultural diversity and sustainability. In: Pretty J., Ball A., Benton T., Guivant J., Lee D., Orr D., Pfeffer M., Ward H., editors. The Sage Handbook of Environment and Society. SAGE Publications Ltd; London, UK: 2007. pp. 267–277.
    1. International Society of Ethnobiology the Declaration of Belem. [(accessed on 11 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.ethnobiology.net/what-we-do/core-programs/global-coalition-2...
    1. Maffi L. Linguistic, Cultural, and Biological Diversity. Annu. Rev. Anthropol. 2005;34:599–617. doi: 10.1146/annurev.anthro.34.081804.120437. - DOI
    1. Cocks M., Wiersum F. Reappraising the Concept of Biocultural Diversity: A Perspective from South Africa. Hum. Ecol. 2014;42:727–737. doi: 10.1007/s10745-014-9681-5. - DOI
    1. Office of Technology Assessment . Technologies to Maintain Biological Diversity. U.S. Government Printing Office; Washington, DC, USA: 1987.

LinkOut - more resources