Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 10;14(4):888.
doi: 10.3390/cancers14040888.

A Randomized Prospective Non-Inferiority Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Blue Dye Compared with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Tracer

Affiliations

A Randomized Prospective Non-Inferiority Trial of Sentinel Lymph Node Biopsy in Early Breast Cancer: Blue Dye Compared with Indocyanine Green Fluorescence Tracer

Michel Coibion et al. Cancers (Basel). .

Abstract

Background: Indocyanine green (ICG) is a promising tracer for sentinel lymph node biopsy in early breast cancer. This randomized study was conducted to evaluate sentinel lymph node biopsy with ICG compared with blue dye as a tracer in woman with early breast cancer without any sign of lymph node invasion.

Methods: Between January 2019 and November 2020, 240 consecutive women with early breast cancer were enrolled and randomized to sentinel lymph node biopsy using ICG or blue dye. The primary endpoint was the sentinel lymph node detection rate in both arms.

Results: ICG was used in 121 patients and detected sentinel lymph nodes in all patients (detection rate, 100%; 95% CI: 96.9-100.0) while blue dye was used in 119 patients and detected sentinel lymph nodes in 116 patients (detection rate: 97.5%, 95% CI: 92.9-99.1). This analysis indicated the non-inferiority of ICG vs. blue dye tracer (90%CI: -1.9-6.9; p = 0.0009).

Conclusion: ICG represents a new promising tracer to detect sentinel lymph nodes in early breast cancer with a detection rate similar to other conventional tracers, and is associated with easy learning and low cost. Our result suggest that this technique is a good alternative to avoid radioactive isotope manipulation.

Keywords: breast cancer; indocyanine green; sentinel lymph node.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Giuliano A.E., Kirgan D.M., Guenther J.M., Morton D.L. Annals of Surgery. Lippincott Williams and Wilkins; Philadelphia, PA, USA: 1994. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer; pp. 391–401. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Veronesi U., Paganelli G., Viale G., Luini A., Zurrida S., Galimberti V., Intra M., Veronesi P., Maisonneuve P., Gatti G., et al. Sentinel-lymph-node biopsy as a staging procedure in breast cancer: Update of a randomised controlled study. Lancet Oncol. 2006;7:983–990. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(06)70947-0. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Qiu S.-Q., Zhang G.-J., Jansen L., de Vries J., Schröder C.P., de Vries E.G., van Dam G.M. Evolution in sentinel lymph node biopsy in breast cancer. Crit. Rev. Oncol. Hematol. 2018;123:83–94. doi: 10.1016/j.critrevonc.2017.09.010. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Krag D.N., Anderson S., Julian T.B., Brown A.M., Harlow S.P., Ashikaga T., Weaver D.L., Miller B.J., Jalovec L.M., Frazier T.G., et al. Technical outcomes of sentinel-lymph-node resection and conventional axillary-lymph-node dissection in patients with clinically node-negative breast cancer: Results from the NSABP B-32 randomised phase III trial. Lancet Oncol. 2007;8:881–888. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(07)70278-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cardoso F., Kyriakides S., Ohno S., Penault-Llorca F., Poortmans P., Rubio I.T., Zackrisson S., Senkus E. Early breast cancer: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol. 2019;30:1194–1220. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdz173. - DOI - PubMed