Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 11;19(4):2003.
doi: 10.3390/ijerph19042003.

Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments

Affiliations

Patient Participation and the Environment: A Scoping Review of Instruments

Maya Kylén et al. Int J Environ Res Public Health. .

Abstract

Patient participation and the environment are critical factors in achieving qualitative healthcare. We conducted a systematic scoping review using Arksey and O'Malley's framework to identify instruments intended to measure patient participation. We assessed those instruments' characteristics, which areas of the healthcare continuum they target, and whether environmental factors are considered. Instruments were considered eligible if they represented the patient perspective and measured patient participation in healthcare. The search was limited to articles written in English and published in the last 10 years. We extracted concepts (i.e., patient empowerment, patient participation, and patient-centeredness) based on the framework developed by Castro et al. and outcomes of significance regarding the review questions and specific objectives. The search was conducted in PsycINFO, CINHAL/EBSCO, and PubMed in September 2019 and July 2020. Of 4802 potential titles, 67 studies reported on a total of 45 instruments that met the inclusion criteria for this review. The concept of patient participation was represented most often in these studies. Although some considered the social environment, no instrument was found to incorporate and address the physical environment. Thirteen instruments were generic and the remaining instruments were intended for specific diagnoses or healthcare contexts. Our work is the first to study instruments from this perspective, and we conclude that there is a lack of instruments that measure aspects of the social and physical environment coherently as part of patient participation.

Keywords: environment; healthcare; patient participation; patient-reported instruments; scoping review.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
PRISMA chart.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Baker A. Crossing the quality chasm: A new health system for the 21st century. BMJ. 2001;323:1192. doi: 10.1136/bmj.323.7322.1192. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Morgan S., Yoder L.H. A concept analysis of person-centered care. J. Holist. Nurs. 2012;30:6–15. doi: 10.1177/0898010111412189. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groene O., Garcia-Barbero M. Health Promotion in Hospitals: Evidence and Quality Management. WHO Regional Office for Europe; Copenhagen, Denmark: 2005. [(accessed on 15 December 2021)]. Available online: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.514.3778&rep=re....
    1. Phelan A., McCormack B., Dewing J., Brown D., Cardiff S., Cook N.F., Dickson C.A., Kmetec S., Lorber M., Magowan R., et al. Review of developments in person-centred healthcare. IPDJ. 2020;10 doi: 10.19043/ipdj.10Suppl2.003. - DOI
    1. Shay L.A., Lafata J.E. Where is the evidence? A systematic review of shared decision making and patient outcomes. Med. Decis. Mak. 2015;35:114–131. doi: 10.1177/0272989X14551638. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources