Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 14;11(4):995.
doi: 10.3390/jcm11040995.

Umbilical Endometriosis: A Systematic Literature Review and Pathogenic Theory Proposal

Affiliations
Review

Umbilical Endometriosis: A Systematic Literature Review and Pathogenic Theory Proposal

Dhouha Dridi et al. J Clin Med. .

Abstract

Umbilical endometriosis represents 30-40% of abdominal wall endometriosis and around 0.5-1.0% of all cases of endometriosis. The aim of this systematic review is to revisit the epidemiology, signs, and symptoms and to formulate a pathogenic theory based on literature data. We performed a systematic literature review using the PubMed and Embase databases from 1 January 1950 to 7 February 2021, according to the PRISMA guidelines. The review was registered at PROSPERO (CRD42021239670). Studies were selected if they reported original data on umbilical endometriosis nodule defined at histopathological examination and described as the presence of endometrial glands and/or stromal cells in the connective tissue. A total of 11 studies (10 retrospective and one prospective), and 14 case series were included in the present review. Overall, 232 umbilical endometriosis cases were reported, with the number per study ranging from 1 to 96. Umbilical endometriosis was observed in 76 (20.9%; 95% CI 17.1-25.4) of the women included in studies reporting information on the total number of cases of abdominal wall endometriosis. Umbilical endometriosis was considered a primary form in 68.4% (158/231, 95% CI 62.1-74.1) of cases. A history of endometriosis and previous abdominal surgery were reported in 37.9% (25/66, 95% CI 27.2-49.9) and 31.0% (72/232, 95% CI 25.4-37.3) of cases, respectively. Pain was described in 83% of the women (137/165, 95% CI 76.6-88.0), followed by catamenial symptoms in 83.5% (142/170, 95% CI, 77.2-88.4) and bleeding in 50.9% (89/175, 95% CI 43.5-58.2). In the 148 women followed for a period ranging from three to 92.5 months, seven (4.7%, 95% CI 2.3-9.4) recurrences were observed. The results of this analysis show that umbilical endometriosis represents about 20% of all the abdominal wall endometriotic lesions and that over two thirds of cases are primary umbilical endometriosis forms. Pain and catamenial symptoms are the most common complaints that suggest the diagnosis. Primary umbilical endometriosis may originate from implantation of regurgitated endometrial cells conveyed by the clockwise peritoneal circulation up to the right hemidiaphragm and funneled toward the umbilicus by the falciform and round liver ligaments.

Keywords: Villar’s nodule; endometriosis; frequency; pain; symptoms; umbilical endometriosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors report no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow diagram of study identification and selection.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Endometriosis infiltrating the entire skin aspect of the umbilicus.
Figure 3
Figure 3
The umbilical peduncle is dissected down to the parietal peritoneum, which is included in the resected tissue (a). Anatomical specimen of en-bloc resection of umbilical endometriosis from the skin aspect to the parietal peritoneum (b).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Pathology specimen after full-thickness omphalectomy for umbilical endometriosis. At scanning magnification ((a), hematoxylin-eosin, 10×), foci of endometriosis are apparent, spanning from the deeper tissues of the abdominal wall throughout the dermal layer (left to right). At higher magnification ((b), hematoxylin-eosin, 100×), endometrial glands are identified in the stroma underlying the parietal peritoneal mesothelial surface (arrows).

References

    1. Rowlands I.J., Abbott J.A., Montgomery G.W., Hockey R., Rogers P., Mishra G.D. Prevalence and incidence of endometriosis in Australian women: A data linkage cohort study. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2021;128:657–665. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.16447. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Christ J.P., Yu O., Schulze-Rath R., Grafton J., Hansen K., Reed S.D. Incidence, prevalence, and trends in endometriosis diagnosis: A United States population-based study from 2006 to 2015. Am. J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;225 doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2021.06.067. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Eisenberg V.H., Weil C., Chodick G., Shalev V. Epidemiology of endometriosis: A large population-based database study from a healthcare provider with 2 million members. BJOG Int. J. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2018;125:55–62. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.14711. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Gylfason J.T., Kristjansson K.A., Sverrisdottir G., Jonsdottir K., Rafnsson V., Geirsson R.T. Pelvic endometriosis diagnosed in an entire nation over 20 years. Am. J. Epidemiol. 2010;172:237–243. doi: 10.1093/aje/kwq143. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Calagna G., Perino A., Chianetta D., Vinti D., Triolo M.M., Rimi C., Cucinella G., Agrusa A. Primary umbilical endometrioma: Analyzing the pathogenesis of endometriosis from an unusual localization. Taiwan J. Obstet. Gynecol. 2015;54:306–312. doi: 10.1016/j.tjog.2014.03.011. - DOI - PubMed