Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 9;12(2):262.
doi: 10.3390/life12020262.

Promoting Exercise Training Remotely

Affiliations
Review

Promoting Exercise Training Remotely

Stephanie A Robinson et al. Life (Basel). .

Abstract

There has been increased incentivization to develop remote exercise training programs for those living with chronic respiratory diseases, such as chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Remote programs offer patients an opportunity to overcome barriers to accessing traditional in-person programs, such as pulmonary rehabilitation (PR). Methods to deliver exercise training remotely range in complexity and types of technological modalities, including phone calls, real-time video conferencing, web- and app-based platforms, video games, and virtual reality (VR). There are a number of studies demonstrating the effectiveness of these programs on exercise capacity, dyspnea, and health-related quality of life (HRQL). However, there is great variation in these programs, making it difficult to assess findings across studies. Other aspects that contribute to the effectiveness of these programs include stakeholder perceptions, such as motivation and willingness to engage, and adherence. Finally, while the intent of these remote programs is to overcome barriers to access, they may inadvertently exacerbate access disparities. Future program development efforts should focus on standardizing how remote exercise training is delivered, engaging stakeholders early on to develop patient-centered programs that patients will want to use, and understanding the heterogeneous preferences and needs of those living with chronic respiratory disease in order to facilitate engagement with these programs.

Keywords: access; chronic respiratory disease; exercise; narrative review; technology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

References

    1. Soriano J.B., Kendrick P.J., Paulson K.R., Gupta V., Vos T. GBD Chronic Respiratory Disease Collaborators. Prevalence and attributable health burden of chronic respiratory diseases, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet Respir. Med. 2020;8:585–596. doi: 10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30105-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarthy B., Casey D., Devane D., Murphy K., Murphy E., Lacasse Y. Pulmonary rehabilitation for chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2015 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003793.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Puhan M.A., Gimeno-Santos E., Cates C.J., Troosters T. Pulmonary rehabilitation following exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2016 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005305.pub4. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dowman L., Hill C.J., May A., Holland A.E. Pulmonary rehabilitation for interstitial lung disease. Cochrane Database Syst. Rev. 2021 doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006322.pub3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lee A.L., Hill C.J., McDonald C.F., Holland A.E. Pulmonary rehabilitation in individuals with non–cystic fibrosis bronchiectasis: A systematic review. Arch. Phys. Med. Rehabil. 2017;98:774–782. doi: 10.1016/j.apmr.2016.05.017. - DOI - PubMed