Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8:15:809714.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2021.809714. eCollection 2021.

Changes in Electroencephalography Activity of Sensory Areas Linked to Car Sickness in Real Driving Conditions

Affiliations

Changes in Electroencephalography Activity of Sensory Areas Linked to Car Sickness in Real Driving Conditions

Eléonore H Henry et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

Car sickness is a major concern for car passengers, and with the development of autonomous vehicles, increasing numbers of car occupants are likely to be affected. Previous laboratory studies have used EEG measurements to better understand the cerebral changes linked to symptoms. However, the dynamics of motion in labs/simulators differ from those of a real car. This study sought to identify specific cerebral changes associated with the level of car sickness experienced in real driving conditions. Nine healthy volunteers participated as front passengers in a slalom session inducing lateral movements at very low frequency (0.2 Hz). They were continuously monitored via EEG recordings and subjectively rated their level of symptoms after each slalom, using a 5-point likert scale. Car-sickness symptoms evolved concomitantly with changes in theta and alpha power in the occipital and parietal areas. These changes may reflect altered sensory integration, as well as a possible influence of sleepiness mitigating symptoms.

Keywords: EEG activity; car passenger; car sickness; real driving; sensory integration.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Representation of (A) test set-up and timeline of the test session with each period: two baseline periods (parked and straight road), slaloms and recovery period; (B) the six time intervals per session analyzed for EEG signal recordings: baseline parked (BasP), baseline straight road (BasS), slaloms (comprising RTstart, RT++, RTstop) and recovery (Recov); see section “Data Acquisition and Processing”.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Illustration of (A) electrode positioning based on a modified International 10–20 Electrode Placement System; (B) EEG headset (14 dry and active Conscious Labs electrodes (https://conscious-labs.com)) with the OpenBCI (http://openbci.com) acquisition card (right).
FIGURE 3
FIGURE 3
(A) LFP Z-scored trace for frontal, central, parietal and occipital electrodes; (B) Spectrogram of O2 electrode signal during the entire baseline parked (300 s). Note the emergence of alpha burst (8–12 Hz range) during the 1 min with eyes closed (from minute 2 to 3); (C) Time-resolved power spectral density (PSD, using complex Morlet wavelet transform); (D) resulting PSD.
FIGURE 4
FIGURE 4
Distribution of maximum ratings reached by participants: white (0–1); light gray (1–2); dark gray (2–3) and black (>3).
FIGURE 5
FIGURE 5
Car-sickness subjective ratings observed for each test period (BasP, RTstart, RT++, RTstop and Recov) (mean ± SEM; n = 9; *p < 0.05 and **p < 0.01 at risk α = 0.05).
FIGURE 6
FIGURE 6
Power observed in alpha (A–C) and theta bands (B–D) for parietal (A,B) and occipital areas (C,D) for each test period (BasP, RTstart, RT++, RTstop and Recov) (mean ± SEM; n = 9; *p < 0.05, **p < 0.01, and ***p < 0.001 at risk α = 0.05).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bokil H., Andrews P., Kulkarni J. E., Mehta S., Mitra P. P. (2010). Chronux: a platform for analyzing neural signals. J. Neurosci. Methods 192 146–151. 10.1016/j.jneumeth.2010.06.020 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bos J. E., Bles W. (1998). Modelling motion sickness and subjective vertical mismatch detailed for vertical motions. Brain Res. Bull. 47 537–542. 10.1016/S0361-9230(98)00088-4 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bronstein A. M., Golding J. F., Gresty M. A. (2013). Vertigo and dizziness from environmental motion: visual vertigo, motion sickness, and drivers’ disorientation. Semin. Neurol. 33 219–230. 10.1055/s-0033-1354602 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Caplan J. B., Madsen J. R., Schulze-Bonhage A., Aschenbrenner-Scheibe R., Newman E. L., Kahana M. J. (2003). Human θ oscillations related to sensorimotor integration and spatial learning. J. Neurosci. 23 4726–4736. 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.23-11-04726.2003 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Y. C., Duann J. R., Chuang S. W., Lin C. L., Ko L. W., Jung T. P., et al. (2010). Spatial and temporal EEG dynamics of motion sickness. NeuroImage 49 2862–2870. 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.10.005 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources