Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8:14:804307.
doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.804307. eCollection 2022.

A Role of Socioeconomic Status in Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults in Macau: A Decomposition Approach

Affiliations

A Role of Socioeconomic Status in Cognitive Impairment Among Older Adults in Macau: A Decomposition Approach

Zhuo Zhang et al. Front Aging Neurosci. .

Abstract

Background: To explore the prevalence and inequality of cognitive impairment among older adults in Macau and the contributions of influencing factors to inequality in cognitive impairment.

Methods: The Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) was used to measure the prevalence of cognitive impairment. Socioeconomic status scores were used to describe economic level of the subjects. The concentration index was applied to measure the inequality of cognitive impairment associated with socioeconomic status (SES) and decomposed into its influencing factors.

Results: The prevalence of cognitive impairment was 44.35% in Macau. The concentration index of cognitive impairment among the elderly was -0.165 (95% CI: -0.232 to -0.098), indicating that the prevalence of cognitive impairment was concentrated in households with poor SES. Older age, poor SES, long or short sleep duration, other marital status, poor appetite, no tea/coffee drinking, no religious belief, and depression contributed positively to the inequality of cognitive impairment. Among these factors, SES made the largest contribution to inequality, accounting for 76.74%.

Conclusion: In Macau, the prevalence of cognitive impairment among people aged 65 years and older is concentrated among those who are in poor economic conditions. Reducing the gap between the rich and the poor at the source, increasing educational level of low SES population and improving their access to healthcare services will help to improve the inequity of cognitive impairment.

Keywords: Macau elderly; cognitive impairment; concentration index; inequality; socioeconomic status.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
Concentration curve of cognitive impairment. The shadow around the curve represent 95%CI.
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
Concentration curve of cognitive impairment in female elderly. The shadow around the curve represent 95%CI.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bennett S., Thomas A. J. (2014). Depression and dementia: cause, consequence or coincidence? Maturitas 79 184–190. 10.1016/j.maturitas.2014.05.009 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cannon J. A., Moffitt P., Perez-Moreno A. C., Walters M. R., Broomfield N. M., Mcmurray J. J. V., et al. (2017). Cognitive Impairment and Heart Failure: systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. J. Card. Fail. 23 464–475. 10.1016/j.cardfail.2017.04.007 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Cermakova P., Formanek T., Kagstrom A., Winkler P. (2018). Socioeconomic position in childhood and cognitive aging in Europe. Neurology 91 e1602–e1610. 10.1212/wnl.0000000000006390 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Clay E., Zhou J., Yi Z. M., Zhai S., Toumi M. (2019). Economic burden for Alzheimer’s disease in China from 2010 to 2050: a modelling study. J. Mark. Access Health Policy 7:1667195. 10.1080/20016689.2019.1667195 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dalstra J. A., Kunst A. E., Borrell C., Breeze E., Cambois E., Costa G., et al. (2005). Socioeconomic differences in the prevalence of common chronic diseases: an overview of eight European countries. Int. J. Epidemiol. 34 316–326. 10.1093/ije/dyh386 - DOI - PubMed