Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 8:12:678035.
doi: 10.3389/fneur.2021.678035. eCollection 2021.

Multimodal Evoked Potentials as Potential Biomarkers of Disease Activity in Patients With Clinically Isolated Syndrome

Affiliations

Multimodal Evoked Potentials as Potential Biomarkers of Disease Activity in Patients With Clinically Isolated Syndrome

Edyta Dziadkowiak et al. Front Neurol. .

Abstract

Objective: There is an ongoing search for markers useful in monitoring and predicting disease activity at the early stage of multiple sclerosis (MS). The goals of this study were to prospectively evaluate the changes in parameters of multimodal evoked potentials (EP) and cognition within a 3-year follow-up period in patients with clinically isolated syndrome (CIS), and to assess the prognostic value of baseline findings with regard to the disease outcomes.

Methods: In 29 patients (20 women, nine men, mean age 31.1) multimodal (visual, brainstem auditory, somatosensory, event-related) EP and neuropsychological tests (NT) were performed at baseline (T0) and after 1 (T1) and 3 (T3) years. Their results were compared longitudinally between baseline, T1, and T3. Baseline results confirmed conversion of CIS into multiple sclerosis (MS) and disability level at T1 and T3 using multiple comparisons and a logistic regression model.

Results: Apart from mean N13/P16 SEP (somatosensory evoked potentials) amplitude (lower at T1 and T3 than at baseline (T0 1.02 ± 0.37 μV, T1 0.90 ± 0.26 μV, T3 0.74 ± 0.32 μV, p < 0.05 for both comparisons), no significant changes of EP or NT parameters were found in longitudinal assessment. Baseline P300 Pz latency was longer for the patients with MS than for those with CIS at T1 (352.69 vs. 325.56 ms). No predictive value was shown for any of the analyzed baseline variables with regard to conversion from CIS into MS.

Significance: Baseline ERP abnormalities were associated with their short-term conversion into MS. ERP are worth considering in multimodal EP evaluation at the early stage of MS.

Keywords: clinically isolated syndrome; cognitive performance; event-related potentials; multimodal evoked potentials; multiple sclerosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The results of BRBNT during the 3-year follow-up. BRBNT, Brief Repeatable Battery of Neuropsychological Tests.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Thompson AJ, Banwell BL, Barkhof F, Carroll WM, Coetzee T, Comi G, et al. . Diagnosis of multiple sclerosis: 2017 revisions of the McDonald criteria. Lancet Neurol. (2018) 17:162–73. 10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brownlee WJ, Altmann DR, Prados F, Miszkiel KA, Eshaghi A, Gandini Wheeler-Kingshott CAM, et al. . Early imaging predictors of long-term outcomes in relapse-onset multiple sclerosis. Brain. (2019) 142:2276–87. 10.1093/brain/awz156 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Miller DH, Chard DT, Ciccarelli O. Clinically isolated syndromes. Lancet Neurol. (2012) 11:157–69. 10.1016/S1474-4422(11)70274-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kuhle J, Disanto G, Dobson R, Adiutori R, Bianchi L, Topping J, et al. . Conversion from clinically isolated syndrome to multiple sclerosis: a large multicentre study. Mult Scler. (2015) 21:1013–24. 10.1177/1352458515588583 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Leocani L, Rocca MA, Comi G. MRI and neurophysiological measures to predict course disability and treatment response in multiple sclerosis. Curr Opin Neurol. (2016) 29:243–53. 10.1097/WCO.0000000000000333 - DOI - PubMed