Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 8:13:826577.
doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2022.826577. eCollection 2022.

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Tumors Harboring Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Challenges in Attaining Efficacy

Affiliations
Review

Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Tumors Harboring Homologous Recombination Deficiency: Challenges in Attaining Efficacy

Saulo Brito Silva et al. Front Immunol. .

Abstract

Cancer cells harbor genomic instability due to accumulated DNA damage, one of the cancer hallmarks. At least five major DNA Damage Repair (DDR) pathways are recognized to repair DNA damages during different stages of the cell cycle, comprehending base excision repair (BER), nucleotide excision repair (NER), mismatch repair (MMR), homologous recombination (HR), and non-homologous end joining (NHEJ). The unprecedented benefits achieved with immunological checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in tumors with mismatch repair deficiency (dMMR) have prompted efforts to extend this efficacy to tumors with HR deficiency (HRD), which are greatly sensitive to chemotherapy or PARP inhibitors, and also considered highly immunogenic. However, an in-depth understanding of HRD's molecular underpinnings has pointed to essential singularities that might impact ICIs sensitivity. Here we address the main molecular aspects of HRD that underlie a differential profile of efficacy and resistance to the treatment with ICIs compared to other DDR deficiencies.

Keywords: DNA damage repair; homologous recombination; immune checkpoint inhibitors; mismatch repair; oncology.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LMC reports grants from Novartis and BMS. The remaining authors declare that the research was conducted without any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Increased rate of DNA double strands breaks due to deficiency in HR might evolve with molecular events that lead to challenges in restoring immune responses through immune checkpoint inhibitors. (1) DNA double-strand breaks association with CNV and large structural genetic alterations contribute to an increased flux of unstable mRNA and, ultimately, proteins that may saturate critical chaperones and the proteasome complex, thus leading to a dysfunctional tumor antigen presentation. (2) ATM plays a central role in recognizing DNA strand breaks but can also upregulate glycolysis and PPP to replenish nucleotides and NADPH supply for the upcoming anabolic reactions to restore DNA damages. This metabolic regulation might deprive glucose in the tumor microenvironment and export acid lactic, impacting immune responses. (3) CHK1 is crucial to repair strands breaks but may also activate the STAT1-STAT3-IRF1 signaling pathway that contributes to upregulating PD-L1 expression. (4) Cytosolic DNA censoring can lead to STING-IRF3 production of IFN-I, which might recruit monocytes that will be further exposed to a range of tolerogenic stimuli in the tumor microenvironment. Moreover, the STING signaling pathway might induce IDO1, and the expression of IFN-I might upregulate CD73, thus contributing to producing inhibitory molecules in the tumor microenvironment. Created with BioRender.com.

References

    1. Knijnenburg TA, Wang L, Zimmermann MT, Chambwe N, Gao GF, Cherniack AD, et al. . Genomic and Molecular Landscape of DNA Damage Repair Deficiency Across The Cancer Genome Atlas. Cell Rep (2018) 23(1):239–54.e6. doi: 10.1016/j.celrep.2018.03.076 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hartwell LH, Szankasi P, Roberts CJ, Murray AW, Friend SH. Integrating Genetic Approaches Into the Discovery of Anticancer Drugs. Science (1997) 278(5340):1064–8. doi: 10.1126/science.278.5340.1064 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Madhusudan S, Middleton MR. The Emerging Role of DNA Repair Proteins as Predictive, Prognostic and Therapeutic Targets in Cancer. Cancer Treat Rev (2005) 31(8):603–17. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2005.09.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Le DT, Durham JN, Smith KN, Wang H, Bartlett BR, Aulakh LK, et al. . Mismatch Repair Deficiency Predicts Response of Solid Tumors to PD-1 Blockade. Science (2017) 357(6349):409–13. doi: 10.1126/science.aan6733 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ma J, Setton J, Lee NY, Riaz N, Powell SN. The Therapeutic Significance of Mutational Signatures From DNA Repair Deficiency in Cancer. Nat Commun (2018) 9(1):1–12. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-05228-y - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances