Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Editorial
. 2021 Dec 13:15:ed119.
doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2021.ed119. eCollection 2021.

How aging of the global population is changing oncology

Affiliations
Editorial

How aging of the global population is changing oncology

Yan Fei Gu et al. Ecancermedicalscience. .

Abstract

Population aging is causing a demographic redistribution with implications for the future of healthcare. How will this affect oncology? First, there will be an overall rise in cancer affecting older adults, even though age-specific cancer incidences continue to fall due to better prevention. Second, there will be a wider spectrum of health functionality in this expanding cohort of older adults, with differences between "physiologically older" and "physiologically younger" patients becoming more important for optimal treatment selection. Third, greater teamwork with supportive care, geriatric, mental health and rehabilitation experts will come to enrich oncologic decision-making by making it less formulaic than it is at present. Success in this transition to a more nuanced professional mindset will depend in part on the development of user-friendly computational tools that can integrate a complex mix of quantitative and qualitative inputs from evidence-based medicine, functional and cognitive assessments, and the personal priorities of older adults.

Keywords: clinical decision-making; demography; longevity; quality of life; supportive care.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

All authors declare no support from any organisation for the submitted work, no financial relationships with any organisations that might have an interest in the submitted work, and no other relationships or activities that could appear to have influenced the submitted work.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. Comparison of the traditional chronological view of aging with a physiological (or “functional”, “biological”, etc.) viewpoint adapted for patients with a cancer diagnosis.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Pathogenetic and socioeconomic interplays relevant to the changing physiological age-specificity of cancer demographics.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Decision-making schematic showing influence of survival gains balanced with other factors including mechanistic interventions, quality of life strategies, and personal priorities.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Khan HTA. Population ageing in a globalized world: risks and dilemmas? J Eval Clin Pract. 2019;25(5):754–760. - PubMed
    1. Song Z, Ferris TG. Baby boomers and beds: a demographic challenge for the ages. J Gen Intern Med. 2018;33(3):367–369. - PMC - PubMed
    1. England K, Azzopardi-Muscat N. Demographic trends and public health in Europe. Eur J Public Health. 2017;27(suppl_4):9–13. - PubMed
    1. Foreman KJ, Marquez N, Dolgert A, et al. Forecasting life expectancy, years of life lost, and all-cause and cause-specific mortality for 250 causes of death: reference and alternative scenarios for 2016–40 for 195 countries and territories. Lancet. 2018;392(10159):2052–2090. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Seals DR, Justice JN, LaRocca TJ. Physiological geroscience: targeting function to increase healthspan and achieve optimal longevity. J Physiol. 2016;594(8):2001–2024. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources