Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022;26(1):76-97.
doi: 10.1080/19359705.2021.1926389. Epub 2021 Jun 4.

Identity and Relationship-Based Discrimination, and Mental Health in a Sample of Sexual Minority Male Couples

Affiliations

Identity and Relationship-Based Discrimination, and Mental Health in a Sample of Sexual Minority Male Couples

Gabriel Robles et al. J Gay Lesbian Ment Health. 2022.

Abstract

Purpose: The study explored the unique associations of individual identity-based discrimination and relationship-based discrimination with mental health among sexual minority male couples. It also examined whether couples' relationship functioning moderated associations between relationship-based discrimination, the experience of one's romantic relationship being devalued, and mental health outcomes.

Methods: Baseline dyadic data drawn from a clinical trial involving 70 couples (N= 140) were analyzed using Actor-Partner Interdependence Modeling. The sample consisted of sexual minority men, of which 54.3% identified as a person of color. Each partner completed the computerized survey independently. Data were collected using the Relationship Marginalization Scale, Dyadic Adjustment Scale, Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7, and Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale-Revised scales.

Results: Dyadic adjustment moderated (i.e., buffered against) the association between relationship-based discrimination and depressive symptoms. The effects appeared to follow an intra-individual pattern (B ACTOR = -0.06, p = .048 and B PARTNER = -0.07, p = .030) indicating the lack of evidence for crossover effects. The interaction terms predicting anxiety yielded non-significant results.

Conclusions: The current research suggests that dyadic functioning buffers against the effects of stigma. These findings point to the potential utility of interventions to improve relationship functioning into interventions addressing stigma among partnered sexual minority men.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Author Disclosure Statement: No competing financial interests exist.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Actor-Partner interaction plots predicting depressive symptoms.

References

    1. Barnes PW, & Lightsey OR Jr. (2005). Perceived racist discrimination, coping, stress, and life satisfaction. Journal of Multicultural Counseling and Development, 33(1), 48–61.
    1. Barton A, Lavner J, Stanley S, Johnson M, & Rhoades G (2019). “Will You Complete This Survey Too?” Differences Between Individual Versus Dyadic Samples in Relationship Research. Journal of Family Psychology. doi:10.1037/fam0000583 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bodenmann G (1997). Dyadic coping-a systematic-transactional view of stress and coping among couples: Theory and empirical findings. European Review of Applied Psychology, 47, 137–140.
    1. Bodenmann G (2008). Dyadic coping and the significance of this concept for prevention and therapy. Zeitschrift für Gesundheitspsychologie, 16(3), 108–111.
    1. Bostwick WB, Boyd CJ, Hughes TL, & McCabe SE (2010). Dimensions of sexual orientation and the prevalence of mood and anxiety disorders in the United States. American Journal of Public Health, 100(3), 468–475. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2008.152942 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources