Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Mar;6(1):13-23.
doi: 10.2217/3dp-2021-0021. Epub 2022 Jan 19.

The use of 3D-printed models in patient communication: a scoping review

Affiliations

The use of 3D-printed models in patient communication: a scoping review

Gemma Traynor et al. J 3D Print Med. 2022 Mar.

Abstract

3D models have been used as an asset in many clinical applications and a variety of disciplines, and yet the available literature studying the use of 3D models in communication is limited. This scoping review has been conducted to draw conclusions on the current evidence and learn from previous studies, using this knowledge to inform future work. Our search strategy revealed 269 papers, 19 of which were selected for final inclusion and analysis. When assessing the use of 3D models in doctor-patient communication, there is a need for larger studies and studies including a long-term follow up. Furthermore, there are forms of communication that are yet to be researched and provide a niche that may be beneficial to explore.

Keywords: 3D models; 3D printing; communication; rapid prototyping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Financial & competing interests disclosure The authors gratefully acknowledge the support of the British Heart Foundation (CH/17/1/32804), the Bristol BHF Accelerator Award (AA/18/7/34219) and The Grand Appeal (Bristol Children’s Hospital Charity). This study was supported by the NIHR Biomedical Research Centre at University Hospitals Bristol and Weston NHS Foundation Trust and the University of Bristol. J Wray is supported by the NIHR Great Ormond Street Hospital Biomedical Research Centre. The views expressed are those of the authors and not necessarily those of the NIHR or the Department of Health and Social Care. The authors have no other relevant affiliations or financial involvement with any organization or entity with a financial interest in or financial conflict with the subject matter or materials discussed in the manuscript apart from those disclosed. No writing assistance was utilized in the production of this manuscript.

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. CONSORT diagram of the identification of papers from the search strategy to the final inclusion of results.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.. Specialties of the final included results.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.. Logic model for the use of 3D models for communication in medicine.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.. Summary of suggestions for study design of future research.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Zolnierek KB, Dimatteo MR. Physician communication and patient adherence to treatment: a meta-analysis. Med. Care 47(8), 826–834 (2009). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Belasen A, Belasen AT. Doctor–patient communication: a review and a rationale for using an assessment framework. J. Health Organ. Manag. 32(7), 891–907 (2018). - PubMed
    1. Little P, Everitt H, Williamson I et al. Observational study of effect of patient centredness and positive approach on outcomes of general practice consultations. BMJ 323(7318), 908–911 (2001). - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bertakis KD, Azari R. Patient-centered care is associated with decreased health care utilization. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 24(3), 229–239 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Trummer UF, Mueller UO, Nowak P, Stidl T, Pelikan JM. Does physician–patient communication that aims at empowering patients improve clinical outcome? A case study. Patient Educ. Couns. 61(2), 299–306 (2006). - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources