Total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in patients older than 80 years of age: a retrospective matched cohort study
- PMID: 35211809
- DOI: 10.1007/s00402-022-04390-9
Total hip arthroplasty for hip fractures in patients older than 80 years of age: a retrospective matched cohort study
Abstract
Introduction: Increasing age and hip fractures are considered risk factors for post-operative complications in total hip arthroplasty (THA). Consequently, older adults undergoing THA due to hip fracture may have different outcomes and require additional healthcare resources than younger patients. This study aimed to identify the influence of age on discharge disposition and 90-day outcomes of THA performed for hip fractures in patients ≥ 80 years to those aged < 80.
Materials and methods: A retrospective review of 344 patients who underwent primary THA for hip fracture from 2011 to 2021 was conducted. Patients ≥ 80 years old were propensity-matched to a control group < 80 years old. Patient demographics, length of stay (LOS), discharge disposition, and 90-day post-operative outcomes were collected and assessed using Chi-square and independent sample t tests.
Results: A total of 110 patients remained for matched comparison after propensity matching, and the average age in the younger cohort (YC, n = 55) was 67.69 ± 10.48, while the average age in the older cohort (OC, n = 55) was 85.12 ± 4.77 (p ≤ 0.001). Discharge disposition differed between the cohorts (p = 0.005), with the YC being more likely to be discharged home (52.7% vs. 27.3%) or to an acute rehabilitation center (23.6% vs. 16.4%) and less likely to be discharged to a skilled nursing facility (21.8% vs. 54.5%). 90-day revision (3.6% vs. 1.8%; p = 0.558), 90-day readmission (10.9% vs. 14.5%; p = 0.567), 90-day complications (p = 0.626), and 90-day mortality rates (1.8% vs 1.8%; p = 1.000) did not differ significantly between cohorts.
Conclusion: While older patients were more likely to require a higher level of post-hospital care, outcomes and perioperative complication rates were not significantly different compared to a younger patient cohort. Payors need to consider patients' age in future payment models, as discharge disposition comprises a large percentage of post-discharge expenses.
Level of evidence: Level III, Retrospective Cohort Study.
Keywords: Elderly; Hip fracture; Outcomes; Total hip arthroplasty.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.
Similar articles
-
Primary total hip arthroplasty in patients older than 90 years of age: a retrospective matched cohort study.Hip Int. 2023 Jul;33(4):628-632. doi: 10.1177/11207000221082251. Epub 2022 Mar 8. Hip Int. 2023. PMID: 35259975
-
The Frank Stinchfield Award : Total Hip Arthroplasty for Femoral Neck Fracture Is Not a Typical DRG 470: A Propensity-matched Cohort Study.Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017 Feb;475(2):353-360. doi: 10.1007/s11999-016-4868-2. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2017. PMID: 27154530 Free PMC article.
-
Factors associated with hospital stay length, discharge destination, and 30-day readmission rate after primary hip or knee arthroplasty: Retrospective Cohort Study.Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019 Sep;105(5):949-955. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2019.04.012. Epub 2019 Jun 15. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2019. PMID: 31208932 Review.
-
Length of Stay and Discharge Disposition After Total Hip Arthroplasty: A Large Multicenter Propensity Matched Comparison of Robotic-Assisted and Manual Techniques.J Arthroplasty. 2024 Sep;39(9S1):S117-S123. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.04.006. Epub 2024 Apr 9. J Arthroplasty. 2024. PMID: 38604284
-
Are periprosthetic hip fractures more severe than native hip fractures? A systematic review of outcomes and resource utilization.Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Mar;144(3):1117-1127. doi: 10.1007/s00402-023-05116-1. Epub 2023 Dec 29. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024. PMID: 38156997
Cited by
-
Time Is Bone: Missed Opportunities for Secondary Prevention After a Hip Fracture.J Clin Med. 2025 Aug 17;14(16):5816. doi: 10.3390/jcm14165816. J Clin Med. 2025. PMID: 40869640 Free PMC article. Review.
References
-
- Chammout GK, Mukka SS, Carlsson T et al (2012) Total hip replacement versus open reduction and internal fixation of displaced femoral neck fractures: a randomized long-term follow-up study. J Bone Jt Surg Ser A. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.K.01615 - DOI
-
- Jenkins PJ, Clement ND, Hamilton DF et al (2013) Predicting the cost-effectiveness of total hip and knee replacement: a health economic analysis. J Bone Jt Surg Ser B. https://doi.org/10.1302/0301-620X.95B1.29835 - DOI
-
- Learmonth ID, Young C, Rorabeck C (2007) The operation of the century: total hip replacement. Lancet 370:1508–1519. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(07)60457-7 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Migliorini F, Trivellas A, Driessen A et al (2020) Hemiarthroplasty versus total arthroplasty for displaced femoral neck fractures in the elderly: meta-analysis of randomized clinical trials. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00402-020-03409-3 - DOI - PubMed - PMC
-
- Sloan M, Premkumar A, Sheth NP (2018) Projected volume of primary total joint arthroplasty in the U.S., 2014 to 2030. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100:1455–1460. https://doi.org/10.2106/JBJS.17.01617 - DOI
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Research Materials