Surgery versus conservative management in congenital lobar emphysema: follow up and indicators for surgery
- PMID: 35212777
- DOI: 10.1007/s00383-022-05086-2
Surgery versus conservative management in congenital lobar emphysema: follow up and indicators for surgery
Abstract
Introduction: Congenital lobar emphysema (CLE), a rare developmental lung malformation, involves the hyperaeration of one or more lung lobes caused by partial obstruction and occurs at a rate of 1/20,000-30,000 live births. Here, we aimed to retrospectively examine the clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopy findings of patients with CLE who were diagnosed and treated by surgical or non-surgical (conservative) approaches at our center and compared our results with those in the literature.
Methods: We examined the clinical, radiological, and bronchoscopy findings of 20 patients with CLE aged 0-18 years at our center between 2013 and 2020. In addition, we examined the symptoms and findings recorded during the patients' follow-up in this retrospective descriptive study.
Results: The median age of 20 patients with CLE at diagnosis was 3.2 years (range 1 day-17 years). Respiratory distress and mediastinal shift were more prominent in patients who underwent surgery, and they were diagnosed at an earlier age compared with patients who were followed up conservatively (p = 0.001, 0.049, 0.001, respectively). Neither the pulmonary lobe involvement nor the bronchoscopy findings were found to be indicative of surgery.
Discussion: We observed that respiratory distress and mediastinal shift were more prominent in patients with a diagnosis of CLE who underwent surgery compared with patients who were conservatively followed up. Moreover, we observed that those who underwent surgery were diagnosed with CLE at an earlier age. In line with the literature, the pulmonary symptoms and CLE-related imaging findings in our study were reduced during conservative follow-up.
Keywords: Congenital lobar emphysema; Congenital pulmonary malformations; Flexible bronchoscopy; Imaging; Lobectomy.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.
References
-
- Pariente G, Aviram M, Landau D, Hershkovitz R (2009) Prenatal diagnosis of congenital lobar emphysema: case report and review of the literature. J Ultrasound Med 28(8):1081–1084. https://doi.org/10.7863/jum.2009.28.8.1081 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Correia-Pinto J, Gonzaga S, Huang Y, Rottier R (2010) Congenital lung lesions–underlying molecular mechanisms. Semin Pediatr Surg 19(3):171–179. https://doi.org/10.1053/j.sempedsurg.2010.03.003 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Andrade CF, Ferreira HP, Fischer GB (2011) Congenital lung malformations. J Bras Pneumol 37(2):259–271. https://doi.org/10.1590/s1806-37132011000200017 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Olutoye OO, Coleman BG, Hubbard AM, Adzick NS (2000) Prenatal diagnosis and management of congenital lobar emphysema. J Pediatr Surg 35(5):792–795. https://doi.org/10.1053/jpsu.2000.6084 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Thakral CL, Maji DC, Sajwani MJ (2001) Congenital lobar emphysema: experience with 21 cases. Pediatr Surg Int 17(2–3):88–91. https://doi.org/10.1007/s003830000506 - DOI - PubMed
MeSH terms
Supplementary concepts
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
