An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
- PMID: 35212879
- PMCID: PMC8877747
- DOI: 10.1007/s11606-021-07263-w
An Estimate of the US Rate of Overuse of Screening Colonoscopy: a Systematic Review
Abstract
Background: This study aims to assess the rate at which screening colonoscopy is performed on patients younger or older than the age range specified in national guidelines, or at shorter intervals than recommended. Such non-indicated use of the procedure is considered low-value care, or overuse. This study is the first systematic review of the rate of non-indicated completed screening colonoscopy in the USA.
Methods: PubMed and Embase were queried for relevant studies on overuse of screening colonoscopy published from January 1, 2002, until January 23, 2019. English-language studies that were conducted for screening colonoscopy after 2001 for average-risk patients were included. Studies must have followed national guidelines for detecting rates of overuse. We followed methods outlined in the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) and the reporting recommendations of the Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology group (MOOSE).
Results: A total of 772 papers were reviewed for inclusion; 42 were reviewed in full text. Of those reviewed, six studies met eligibility criteria, including a total of 459,503 colonoscopies of which 242,756 were screening colonoscopies. The rate of overuse ranged credibly from 17 to 25.7%.
Discussion: This study demonstrates that screening colonoscopy is regularly performed in the USA more often, and in populations older or younger, than recommended by national guidelines. Such overuse wastes resources and places patients at unnecessary risk of harm. Efforts to reduce non-indicated screening colonoscopy are needed.
Keywords: harms; low-value care; overuse; screening colonoscopy.
© 2021. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to Society of General Internal Medicine.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that they do not have a conflict of interest.
Figures
Similar articles
-
An Estimate of Preventable Harms Associated With Screening Colonoscopy Overuse in the U.S.AJPM Focus. 2024 Nov 17;4(1):100296. doi: 10.1016/j.focus.2024.100296. eCollection 2025 Feb. AJPM Focus. 2024. PMID: 39698330 Free PMC article.
-
An Estimate of Severe Harms Due to Screening Colonoscopy: A Systematic Review.J Am Board Fam Med. 2023 May 8;36(3):493-500. doi: 10.3122/jabfm.2022.220320R2. Epub 2023 May 11. J Am Board Fam Med. 2023. PMID: 37169588
-
Overuse of colonoscopy for colorectal cancer screening and surveillance.J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Mar;30(3):277-83. doi: 10.1007/s11606-014-3015-6. Epub 2014 Sep 30. J Gen Intern Med. 2015. PMID: 25266407 Free PMC article.
-
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881. Med J Aust. 2020. PMID: 33314144
-
Overuse of computed tomography for mild head injury: A systematic review and meta-analysis.PLoS One. 2024 Jan 11;19(1):e0293558. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0293558. eCollection 2024. PLoS One. 2024. PMID: 38206917 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
ARE QUALITY INDICATORS IMPORTANT IN COLONOSCOPIES? ANALYSIS OF 3,076 EXAMS IN A PRIVATE TERTIARY SERVICE IN SOUTHEASTERN BRAZIL.Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025 Feb 10;37:e1864. doi: 10.1590/0102-6720202400070e1864. eCollection 2025. Arq Bras Cir Dig. 2025. PMID: 39936819 Free PMC article.
-
Development and validation of a new ICD-10-based screening colonoscopy overuse measure in a large integrated healthcare system: a retrospective observational study.BMJ Qual Saf. 2023 Jul;32(7):414-424. doi: 10.1136/bmjqs-2021-014236. Epub 2022 Oct 3. BMJ Qual Saf. 2023. PMID: 36192148 Free PMC article.
-
Racial and Ethnic Differences in Low-Value Care Among Older Adults in a Large Statewide Health System.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025 Mar;73(3):900-909. doi: 10.1111/jgs.19369. Epub 2025 Feb 3. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2025. PMID: 39898412 Free PMC article.
-
A "sludge audit" for health system colorectal cancer screening services.Am J Manag Care. 2023 Jul 1;29(7):e222-e228. doi: 10.37765/ajmc.2023.89402. Am J Manag Care. 2023. PMID: 37523455 Free PMC article.
-
When should electronic medical records reminders for cancer screening stop?-Results from a national physician survey.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023 Sep;71(9):2878-2885. doi: 10.1111/jgs.18412. Epub 2023 May 24. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2023. PMID: 37224393 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
References
-
- Davidson, K. W., Barry, M. J., Mangione, et al. Screening for Colorectal Cancer: US Preventive Services Task Force Recommendation Statement. JAMA. 2021;325(19), 1965–1977. - PubMed
-
- Rex DK, Boland CR, Dominitz JA, et al. Colorectal cancer screening: recommendations for physicians and patients from the U.S. multi-society task force on colorectal cancer. Gastroenterology. 2017;153:307–23. - PubMed
-
- [3] Lin, J. S., Piper, M. A., Perdue, L. A., et al. Screening for colorectal cancer: updated evidence report and systematic review for the US Preventive Services Task Force. Jama 315.23 2016: 2576-2594. - PubMed
-
- US Preventive Services Task Force. Colorectal screening draft recommendation statement. October 27, 2020. Available at: https://www.uspreventiveservicestaskforce.org/uspstf/draft-recommendatio.... Accessed January 21, 2021.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous