Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2022 Aug;74(4):1187-1197.
doi: 10.1007/s13304-022-01256-y. Epub 2022 Feb 25.

Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis

Jie Wu et al. Updates Surg. 2022 Aug.

Abstract

The impact of positive circumferential resection margin on prognosis in esophageal cancer is under controversy. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses had limitations. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic impact of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer.PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the association between circumferential resection margin status and prognosis in esophageal cancer. Study population were focused on T3 and/or T4a patients. Study selection was based on availability of survival information (Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted analysis). Random-effects models were used to summarize hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival.According to College of American Pathologists criteria, circumferential resection margin-positive patients had shorter median overall survival (P < 0.0001) and shorter median disease-free survival (P < 0.0001) compared with circumferential resection margin-negative patients. The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival were 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.53; P < 0.0001) and 2.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.84; P < 0.0001), respectively. According to the Royal College of Pathologists criteria, circumferential resection margin-positive patients had shorter median overall survival (P < 0.0001) and shorter median disease-free survival (P < 0.0001) compared with circumferential resection margin-negative patients. The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival were 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48; P < 0.0001) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.57; P < 0.0001), respectively.ompared with negative circumferential resection margin, positive circumferential resection margin is associated with worse survival outcomes in esophageal cancer.

Keywords: Circumferential resection margin; Esophageal cancer; Prognosis; Survival.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D (2016) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v50–v57. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw329 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Corvera C, Das P, Denlinger CS (2019) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:855–883. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Law S, Arcilla C, Chu KM, Wong J (1998) The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 176:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00140-8 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Mariette C, Castel B, Balon JM, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP (2003) Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00109-4 - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources