Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
- PMID: 35212980
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-022-01256-y
Positive circumferential resection margin in locally advanced esophageal cancer: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis
Abstract
The impact of positive circumferential resection margin on prognosis in esophageal cancer is under controversy. Previous systematic reviews and meta-analyses had limitations. This updated systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the prognostic impact of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer.PubMed and Web of Science were searched for studies investigating the association between circumferential resection margin status and prognosis in esophageal cancer. Study population were focused on T3 and/or T4a patients. Study selection was based on availability of survival information (Kaplan-Meier curves and adjusted analysis). Random-effects models were used to summarize hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival.According to College of American Pathologists criteria, circumferential resection margin-positive patients had shorter median overall survival (P < 0.0001) and shorter median disease-free survival (P < 0.0001) compared with circumferential resection margin-negative patients. The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival were 2.06 (95% confidence interval, 1.68-2.53; P < 0.0001) and 2.00 (95% confidence interval, 1.41-2.84; P < 0.0001), respectively. According to the Royal College of Pathologists criteria, circumferential resection margin-positive patients had shorter median overall survival (P < 0.0001) and shorter median disease-free survival (P < 0.0001) compared with circumferential resection margin-negative patients. The pooled hazard ratios for overall survival and disease-free survival were 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.16-1.48; P < 0.0001) and 1.31 (95% confidence interval, 1.09-1.57; P < 0.0001), respectively.ompared with negative circumferential resection margin, positive circumferential resection margin is associated with worse survival outcomes in esophageal cancer.
Keywords: Circumferential resection margin; Esophageal cancer; Prognosis; Survival.
© 2022. Italian Society of Surgery (SIC).
Similar articles
-
Prognostic significance of positive circumferential resection margin in esophageal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Ann Thorac Surg. 2014 Feb;97(2):446-53. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2013.10.043. Epub 2013 Dec 21. Ann Thorac Surg. 2014. PMID: 24365211
-
The prognostic value of circumferential resection margin (CRM) definition and location in esophageal cancer: A 12-year cohort study.Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025 Aug;51(8):110138. doi: 10.1016/j.ejso.2025.110138. Epub 2025 May 9. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2025. PMID: 40373732
-
Systematic review and meta-analysis of the influence of circumferential resection margin involvement on survival in patients with operable oesophageal cancer.Br J Surg. 2013 Mar;100(4):456-64. doi: 10.1002/bjs.9015. Epub 2013 Jan 14. Br J Surg. 2013. PMID: 23319427
-
Impact of residual disease as a prognostic factor for survival in women with advanced epithelial ovarian cancer after primary surgery.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Sep 26;9(9):CD015048. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015048.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 36161421 Free PMC article.
-
Preoperative chemotherapy for resectable thoracic esophageal cancer.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001;(1):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2001. Update in: Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2003;(4):CD001556. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001556. PMID: 11279723 Updated.
Cited by
-
Using Pathomics-Based Model for Predicting Positive Surgical Margins in Patients with Esophageal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A Comparative Study of Decision Tree and Nomogram.Int J Gen Med. 2024 Dec 6;17:5869-5882. doi: 10.2147/IJGM.S495296. eCollection 2024. Int J Gen Med. 2024. PMID: 39659511 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bray F, Ferlay J, Soerjomataram I, Siegel RL, Torre LA, Jemal A (2018) Global cancer statistics 2018: GLOBOCAN estimates of incidence and mortality worldwide for 36 cancers in 185 countries. CA Cancer J Clin 68:394–424. https://doi.org/10.3322/caac.21492 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Lordick F, Mariette C, Haustermans K, Obermannová R, Arnold D (2016) Oesophageal cancer: ESMO clinical practice guidelines for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up. Ann Oncol 27:v50–v57. https://doi.org/10.1093/annonc/mdw329 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Ajani JA, D’Amico TA, Bentrem DJ, Chao J, Corvera C, Das P, Denlinger CS (2019) Esophageal and esophagogastric junction cancers, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Canc Netw 17:855–883. https://doi.org/10.6004/jnccn.2019.0033 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Law S, Arcilla C, Chu KM, Wong J (1998) The significance of histologically infiltrated resection margin after esophagectomy for esophageal cancer. Am J Surg 176:286–290. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0002-9610(98)00140-8 - DOI - PubMed
-
- Mariette C, Castel B, Balon JM, Van Seuningen I, Triboulet JP (2003) Extent of oesophageal resection for adenocarcinoma of the oesophagogastric junction. Eur J Surg Oncol 29:588–593. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0748-7983(03)00109-4 - DOI - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical