Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264396.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264396. eCollection 2022.

Infantile subdural hematoma in Japan: A multicenter, retrospective study by the J-HITs (Japanese head injury of infants and toddlers study) group

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

Infantile subdural hematoma in Japan: A multicenter, retrospective study by the J-HITs (Japanese head injury of infants and toddlers study) group

Nobuyuki Akutsu et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objective: Subdural hematoma in infants or toddlers has often been linked to abuse, but it is not clear how many cases actually occur and how many are suspected of abuse. The purpose of this study was to investigate subdural hematoma in infants and toddlers in Japan.

Methods: This multicenter, retrospective study reviewed the clinical records of children younger than 4 years with head trauma who were diagnosed with any finding on head computed tomography (CT) and/or magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), such as skull fracture and/or intracranial injury. A total of 452 children were included. The group suspected to have been abused was classified as nonaccidental, and the group considered to have been caused by an accident was classified as accidental. Subdural hematoma and other factors were examined on multivariate analysis to identify which factors increase the risk of nonaccidental injuries.

Results: Of the 452 patients, 158 were diagnosed with subdural hematoma. Subdural hematoma was the most common finding intracranial finding in head trauma in infants and toddlers. A total of 51 patients were classified into the nonaccidental group, and 107 patients were classified into the accidental group. The age of patients with subdural hematoma showed a bimodal pattern. The mean age of the accidental group with subdural hematoma was significantly older than that in the nonaccidental group (10.2 months vs 5.9 months, respectively. p < 0.001). Multivariate analysis showed that patients under 5 months old, retinal hemorrhage, and seizure were significant risk factors for nonaccidental injury (odds ratio (OR) 3.86, p = 0.0011; OR 7.63, p < 0.001; OR 2.49, p = 0.03; respectively). On the other hand, the odds ratio for subdural hematoma was 1.96, and no significant difference was observed (p = 0.34).

Conclusions: At least in Japanese children, infantile subdural hematoma was frequently observed not only in nonaccidental but also in accidental injuries. In infants with head trauma, age, the presence of retinal hemorrhage, and the presence of seizures should be considered when determining whether they were abused. Subdural hematoma is also a powerful finding to detect abuse, but care should be taken because, in some ethnic groups, such as the Japanese, there are many accidental cases.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Masahiro Nonaka and Young-Soo Park have written statements and appeared in court in child abuse cases both at the request of the prosecutor and the defense. Atsuko Harada has written statements and appeared in court in child abuse cases at the request of the prosecutor. This does not alter our adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Age distribution of all patients in this study.
A: Total, B: Nonaccidental, C: Accidental.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Age distribution of patients with subdural hematoma.
A: Total, B: Nonaccidental, C: Accidental. There is a peak at 2 to 4 of months of age in the nonaccidental group and another peak at 8 to 10 of months of age in the accidental group.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kemp AM, Jaspan T, Griffiths J, Stoodley N, Mann MK, Tempest V, et al.. Neuroimaging: what neuroradiological features distinguish abusive from non-abusive head trauma? A systematic review. Arch Dis Child. 2011;96(12):1103–12. doi: 10.1136/archdischild-2011-300630 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Piteau SJ, Ward MG, Barrowman NJ, Plint AC. Clinical and radiographic characteristics associated with abusive and nonabusive head trauma: a systematic review. Pediatrics. 2012;130(2):315–23. doi: 10.1542/peds.2011-1545 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Fujiwara T, Okuyama M, Miyasaka M. Characteristics that distinguish abusive from nonabusive head trauma among young children who underwent head computed tomography in Japan. Pediatrics. 2008;122(4):e841–7. doi: 10.1542/peds.2008-0387 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Amagasa S, Matsui H, Tsuji S, Uematsu S, Moriya T, Kinoshita K. Characteristics distinguishing abusive head trauma from accidental head trauma in infants with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage in Japan. Acute Med Surg. 2018;5(3):265–71. doi: 10.1002/ams2.341 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Amagasa S, Uematsu S, Tsuji S. Occurrence of traumatic brain injury due to short falls with or without a witness by a nonrelative in children younger than 2 years. J Neurosurg Pediatr. 2020:1–5. doi: 10.3171/2020.6.PEDS20314 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types