Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2022 Feb 25;17(2):e0264315.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264315. eCollection 2022.

Impact of household economic strengthening intervention on food security among caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children in Tanzania

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Impact of household economic strengthening intervention on food security among caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children in Tanzania

Amon Exavery et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

About 2 billion people worldwide suffer moderate or severe forms of food insecurity, calling for correctional measures involving economic strengthening interventions. This study assessed the impact of household economic strengthening (HES) intervention on food security among caregivers of orphans and vulnerable children (OVC) in Tanzania. The study was longitudinal in design, based on OVC caregivers' baseline (2017-2018) and midline (2019) data from the USAID Kizazi Kipya project. Food security, the outcome, was measured using the Household Hunger Scale (HHS) in three categories: little to no hunger (food secure), moderate hunger, and severe hunger. Membership in the USAID Kizazi Kipya-supported economic strengthening intervention (i.e. WORTH Yetu) was the main independent variable. Data analysis involved generalized estimating equation (GEE) for multivariate analysis. With mean age of 50.3 years at baseline, the study analyzed 132,583 caregivers, 72.2% of whom were female. At midline, 7.6% of all caregivers enrolled at baseline were members in WORTH Yetu. Membership in WORTH Yetu was significantly effective in reducing household hunger among the caregivers: severe hunger dropped from 9.4% at baseline to 4.1% at midline; moderate hunger dropped from 65.9% at baseline to 62.8% at midline; and food security (i.e., little to no hunger households) increased from 25.2% at baseline to 33.1% at midline. In the multivariate analysis, membership in WORTH Yetu reduced the likelihood of severe hunger by 47% (OR = 0.53, 95% CI 0.48-0.59), and moderate hunger by 21% (OR = 0.79, 95% CI 0.76-0.83), but increased the likelihood of food security by 45% (OR = 1.45, 95% CI 1.39-1.51). The USAID Kizazi Kipya's model of household economic strengthening for OVC caregivers was effective in improving food security and reducing household hunger in Tanzania. This underscores the need to expand WORTH Yetu coverage. Meanwhile, these results indicate a potential of applying the intervention in similar settings to address household hunger.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Conceptual framework of the effect of WORTH Yetu intervention on household hunger, considering demographic, socioeconomic, individual, household, and environmental characteristics of OVC caregivers in Tanzania.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Caregivers’ duration (in years) in the USAID Kizazi Kipya project from baseline (enrollment) to midline (n = 132,385).
Fig 3
Fig 3. Caregivers’ level of household hunger at baseline and midline (n = 132,583).
Fig 4
Fig 4. Caregivers’ level of household hunger at midline by background characteristics (n = 132,583).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP, WHO. The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2019. Safeguarding against economic slowdowns and downturns. Rome: FAO; 2019 [cited 2021 Jan 18]. Report No.: Licence: CC BY-NC-SA 3.0 IGO. https://docs.wfp.org/api/documents/WFP-0000106760/download/?
    1. Gralak S, Spajic L, Blom I, Omrani OE, Bredhauer J, Uakkas S, et al.. COVID-19 and the future of food systems at the UNFCCC. Lancet Planet Health. 2020. Aug 1;4(8):e309–11. doi: 10.1016/S2542-5196(20)30163-7 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. United Nations. Zero Hunger Challenge: Pathways to Zero Hunger. 2012 [cited 2021 Jan 13]. https://www.un.org/zerohunger/content/challenge-hunger-can-be-eliminated...
    1. Chop E, Duggaraju A, Malley A, Burke V, Caldas S, Yeh PT, et al.. Food insecurity, sexual risk behavior, and adherence to antiretroviral therapy among women living with HIV: A systematic review. Health Care Women Int. 2017. Sep 2;38(9):927–44. doi: 10.1080/07399332.2017.1337774 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Rollins N. Food Insecurity—A Risk Factor for HIV Infection. PLOS Med. 2007. Oct 23;4(10):e301. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.0040301 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types