American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children
- PMID: 35213891
- PMCID: PMC8862774
- DOI: 10.1097/AUD.0000000000001087
American Cochlear Implant Alliance Task Force Guidelines for Determining Cochlear Implant Candidacy in Children
Abstract
This article summarizes the available evidence on pediatric cochlear implantation to provide current guidelines for clinical protocols and candidacy recommendations in the United States. Candidacy determination involves specification of audiologic and medical criteria per guidelines of the Food and Drug Administration. However, recommendations for a cochlear implant evaluation also should maintain flexibility and consider a child's skill progression (i.e., month-for-month progress in speech, language, and auditory development) and quality of life with appropriately fit hearing aids. Moreover, evidence supports medical and clinical decisions based on other factors, including (a) ear-specific performance, which affords inclusion of children with asymmetric hearing loss and single-sided deafness as implant candidates; (b) ear-specific residual hearing, which influences surgical technique and device selection to optimize hearing; and (c) early intervention to minimize negative long-term effects on communication and quality of life related to delayed identification of implant candidacy, later age at implantation, and/or limited commitment to an audiologic rehabilitation program. These evidence-based guidelines for current clinical protocols in determining pediatric cochlear implant candidacy encourage a team-based approach focused on the whole child and the family system.
Copyright © 2022 The Authors. Ear & Hearing is published on behalf of the American Auditory Society, by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
Figures
References
-
- Abidin R. R. Parenting Stress Index: Professional Manual. (1995). Psychological Assessment Resources, Inc.
-
- Adunka O. F., Jewells V., Buchman C. A. Value of computed tomography in the evaluation of children with cochlear nerve deficiency. Otol Neurotol, (2007). 28:597–604. - PubMed
-
- American Academy of Audiology. Clinical Practice Guidelines: Pediatric Amplification. (2013). American Academy of Audiology.
-
- Anne S., Lieu J. E. C., Cohen M. S. Speech and language consequences of unilateral hearing loss: A systematic review. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg, (2017). 157:572–579. - PubMed
-
- Archbold S., Athalye S., Mulla I., Harrigan S., Wolters-Leermakers N., Isarin J., Knoors H. Cochlear implantation in children with complex needs: The perceptions of professionals at cochlear implant centres. Cochlear Implants Int, (2015). 16:303–311. - PubMed
REFERENCE NOTE
-
- FDA. Cochlear Americas Nucleus 24 Cochlear Implant System – P970051/S205. (2022).
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical
