Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Jan 18;14(2):219.
doi: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020219.

Advances in Electrospun Nerve Guidance Conduits for Engineering Neural Regeneration

Affiliations
Review

Advances in Electrospun Nerve Guidance Conduits for Engineering Neural Regeneration

Sanaz Behtaj et al. Pharmaceutics. .

Abstract

Injuries to the peripheral nervous system result in devastating consequences with loss of motor and sensory function and lifelong impairments. Current treatments have largely relied on surgical procedures, including nerve autografts to repair damaged nerves. Despite improvements to the surgical procedures over the years, the clinical success of nerve autografts is limited by fundamental issues, such as low functionality and mismatching between the damaged and donor nerves. While peripheral nerves can regenerate to some extent, the resultant outcomes are often disappointing, particularly for serious injuries, and the ongoing loss of function due to poor nerve regeneration is a serious public health problem worldwide. Thus, a successful therapeutic modality to bring functional recovery is urgently needed. With advances in three-dimensional cell culturing, nerve guidance conduits (NGCs) have emerged as a promising strategy for improving functional outcomes. Therefore, they offer a potential therapeutic alternative to nerve autografts. NGCs are tubular biostructures to bridge nerve injury sites via orienting axonal growth in an organized fashion as well as supplying a supportively appropriate microenvironment. Comprehensive NGC creation requires fundamental considerations of various aspects, including structure design, extracellular matrix components and cell composition. With these considerations, the production of an NGC that mimics the endogenous extracellular matrix structure can enhance neuron-NGC interactions and thereby promote regeneration and restoration of function in the target area. The use of electrospun fibrous substrates has a high potential to replicate the native extracellular matrix structure. With recent advances in electrospinning, it is now possible to generate numerous different biomimetic features within the NGCs. This review explores the use of electrospinning for the regeneration of the nervous system and discusses the main requirements, challenges and advances in developing and applying the electrospun NGC in the clinical practice of nerve injuries.

Keywords: extracellular matrix; fibrous scaffold; neural tissue engineering; peripheral nervous system; physical lumen filler; scaffold topography; structural support.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no significant financial support of this work that could have influenced its outcome.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Electrospinning set-up diagram, electrospun nanofibres and different variables in electrospinning process.
Figure 2
Figure 2
The schematics of PNS damage, NGC, and various physical lumen fillers (PLFs). The nanofibers loaded with the appropriate combination of PLFs facilitate cell regeneration.
Figure 3
Figure 3
(a) SEM images of aligned fibrous scaffolds (scale bar: 10 µm); (b) SEM images of aligned fibrous scaffolds (scale bar: 1 µm); (c) the quantitative distribution of fibre diameters; (d) The orientation direction distribution of the scaffold fibres; (e) the SEM image of the neurons on the aligned scaffold (scale bar: 200 µm); (f) the SEM image of the neurons on the aligned scaffold (scale bar: 20 µm); and (g) the directional histogram of cells on the aligned scaffolds obtained by ImageJ®.

References

    1. Muheremu A., Ao Q. Past, Present, and Future of Nerve Conduits in the Treatment of Peripheral Nerve Injury. BioMed Res. Int. 2015;2015:1–6. doi: 10.1155/2015/237507. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zarrintaj P., Zangene E., Manouchehri S., Amirabad L.M., Baheiraei N., Hadjighasem M.R., Farokhi M., Ganjali M.R., Walker B.W., Saeb M.R., et al. Conductive biomaterials as nerve conduits: Recent advances and future challenges. Appl. Mater. Today. 2020;20:100784. doi: 10.1016/j.apmt.2020.100784. - DOI
    1. Behtaj S. Neuron-fibrous scaffold interfaces in the peripheral nervous system: A perspective on the structural requirements. Neural Regen. Res. 2021 doi: 10.4103/1673-5374.329003. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Houshyar S., Bhattacharyya A., Shanks R. Peripheral Nerve Conduit: Materials and Structures. ACS Chem. Neurosci. 2019;10:3349–3365. doi: 10.1021/acschemneuro.9b00203. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pinho A.C., Fonseca A., Serra A., Santos J.D., Coelho J.F.J. Peripheral Nerve Regeneration: Current Status and New Strategies Using Polymeric Materials. Adv. Healthc. Mater. 2016;5:2732–2744. doi: 10.1002/adhm.201600236. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources