Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 18;11(4):542.
doi: 10.3390/plants11040542.

Features of Chromosome Introgression from Gossypium barbadense L. into G. hirsutum L. during the Development of Alien Substitution Lines

Affiliations

Features of Chromosome Introgression from Gossypium barbadense L. into G. hirsutum L. during the Development of Alien Substitution Lines

Marina Feliksovna Sanamyan et al. Plants (Basel). .

Abstract

The creation of G. barbadense L./G. hirsutum L. chromosome-substitution lines is an important method to transfer agronomically valuable traits from G. barbadense into G. hirsutum. In this study, 30 monosomic lines of G. hirsutum from the Cytogenetic Collection of Uzbekistan, created in the genotypic background of line L-458, were used in crosses with the G. barbadense line Pima 3-79 to create substitution lines. In the course of this work, new monosomic lines were identified for chromosome 12 and monotelodisome 6 of the Atsubgenome and for chromosomes 17, 21, and 22 of the Dtsubgenome using chromosome-specific SSR markers and a well-defined tester set of cotton translocation lines (USA). Compared to those in the F1 hybrids, a strong decrease in the crossing and setting rates was found in the BC1F1 backcross lines, with the substitution of chromosomes 2, 4, 6, 7, and 12 of the Atsubgenome and 17, 18, 21, and 22 of the Dtsubgenome. The F1 and BC1F1 offspring from interspecific crosses differed in their transmission of univalents. Despite the regular pairing of chromosomes and the high meiotic index, interspecific aneuploid hybrids were characterized by a decrease in pollen fertility, which may indicate hidden structural variability in these genomes that did not affect meiotic division. The identification of chromosomes using chromosome-specific SSR markers in the early stages of plant development has greatly accelerated the detection of monosomic plants. The analysis of morphobiological traits revealed that monosomic F1 hybrids were more similar to the donor line, while BC1F1 hybrids were more similar to the recurrent parent but also showed previously undetected traits.

Keywords: G. barbadense; G. hirsutum; chromosome substitution lines; cotton; molecular markers; monosomic lines; translocation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Development of cotton chromosome-substitution lines. The scheme shows the different steps for obtaining cotton chromosome-substitution lines, including cytogenetic analysis and the use of molecular markers (SSRs).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Crossing of aneuploid G. hirsutum L. lines with the G. barbadense L. line Pima 3-79.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Setting of F0 hybrid seeds obtained from crosses of aneuploid G. hirsutum L. lines with the G. barbadense L. line Pima 3-79.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Germination of F0 hybrid seeds obtained from crosses of aneuploid G. hirsutum L. lines with the G. barbadense L. line Pima 3-79.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Twenty-five normal bivalents and one heteromorphic bivalent obtained at Metaphase I of F1 hybrids from a cross between a monotelodisome line Mo21 × Pima 3-79 (1001) for a chromosome 11 arm with the line Pima 3-79. (Heteromorphic bivalent arrowed.) Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Metaphase I in F1 hybrids obtained from crosses of monosomic lines with the line Pima 3-79: (a) (Mo16 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (hybrid 982) with monosomy for chromosome 2; (b) (Mo34 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (hybrid 28) and (c) (Mo95 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (hybrid 1083) with monosomy for chromosome 6; (d) monosomy for chromosome 12 (Mo94 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (813). (Univalents arrowed). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 7
Figure 7
Metaphase I in meiosis of F1 hybrids obtained from crosses of monosomic lines with the line Pima 3-79: (a) (Mo70 × Pima 3-79) (25II +1I) (hybrid 7746) and (b) (Mo89 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (hybrid 5157) with monosomy for chromosome 4; (c) monosomy for chromosome 17 (Mo56 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (413); and (d) monosomy for chromosome 18 (Mo48 × Pima 3-79) (25II + 1I) (52916). (Univalents arrowed.) Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Telophase II in F1 hybrids: (a) Two tetrads without cytokinesis (Mo16 × Pima 3-79) (982); (b) anomalous triad (Mo60 × Pima 3-79) (6945); (c) dyad with two micronuclei; and (d) tetrad with three micronuclei. Scale bar = 40 µm.
Figure 9
Figure 9
Telophase II in F1(Mo67 × Pima 3-79) (3081) hybrid: (a) normal tetrad; (b) two monads and two tetrads; (c) anomalous tetrad; (d) tetrad with a micronucleus; and (e) heptad. Scale bar = 40 µm.
Figure 10
Figure 10
Fertile (coloured) and sterile (uncoloured) pollen grains from a hybrid; (a) F1 (Mo38 × Pima 3-79) (69011) and (b,c) F1(Mo89 × Pima 3-79) (5157) for chromosome 4. Scale bar = 40 µm.
Figure 11
Figure 11
Chromosome identification of monosomic interspecific G. hirsutum × G. barbadense F1 hybrids. SSR primer pair specific for chromosome 12 of the Atsubgenome: BNL1707.
Figure 12
Figure 12
Chromosome identification of monosomic interspecific G. hirsutum × G. barbadense F1 hybrids. SSR primer pair specific for chromosome 17 of the Dtsubgenome: (a) TMB0874; (b) BNL2496.
Figure 13
Figure 13
Chromosome identification of monosomic interspecific G. hirsutum × G. barbadense F1 hybrids. SSR primer pair specific for chromosome 21 of the Dtsubgenome: BNL1705.
Figure 14
Figure 14
“Critical configurations” of the chromosomes at Metaphase I: 24II + 1III from cotton monosomic F1 plants from the cross Mo42 × TT10L-21L. (Arrows point to the trivalents.) Scale bar = 100 µm.
Figure 15
Figure 15
Features of the monosomic cotton lines for chromosome 12: (a) bush, (b) configurations of the chromosomes (25II + 1I), (c) leaf, (d) flower, (e) petal, (f) bracts, (g) staminate column, (h) and (i) green bolls, (j) boll with peduncle, and (k) open boll.
Figure 16
Figure 16
Features of the monosomic cotton lines for chromosome 17: (a) bush, (b) configurations of the chromosomes (25II + 1I), (c) leaf, (d) flower, (e) petal, (f) bracts, (g) staminate column, (h) and (i) green bolls, (j) boll with peduncle, and (k) open boll.
Figure 17
Figure 17
Features of the monosomic cotton line for chromosome 21: (a) bush, (b) configurations of the chromosomes (25II +1I), (c) leaf, (d) flower, (e) petal, (f) bracts, (g) staminate column, (h) and (i) green bolls, (j) boll with peduncle, and (k) open boll.
Figure 18
Figure 18
Features of the monosomic cotton line for chromosome 22: (a) bush, (b) configurations of the chromosomes (25II +1I), (c) leaf, (d) flower, (e) petal, (f) bracts, (g) bract, (h) staminate column, (i) green bolls, (j) boll with peduncle, and (k) open boll.
Figure 19
Figure 19
Features of the monotelodisomic cotton lines for chromosome 6: (a) bush, (b) configurations of the chromosomes (25II + Ii), (c) leaf, (d) flower, (e) petal, (f) bracts, (g) staminate column, (h) and (i) green bolls, (j) boll with peduncle, and (k) open boll.
Figure 20
Figure 20
Crossing of aneuploid lines of cotton G. hirsutum L. with the interspecific aneuploidy hybrid F1 (Mo × Pima 3-79 or Telo × Pima 3-79).
Figure 21
Figure 21
Setting of BC1F1 hybrid seeds obtained from crosses of aneuploid lines of cotton G. hirsutum L. with interspecific aneuploid F1 hybrids (Mo × Pima 3-79 or Telo × Pima 3-79).
Figure 22
Figure 22
Germination of BC1F1 hybrid seeds obtained from crosses of aneuploid lines of cotton G. hirsutum L. with interspecific aneuploid F1 hybrids (Mo × Pima 3-79 or Telo × Pima 3-79).
Figure 23
Figure 23
Metaphase I in BC1F1 hybrids obtained from crosses of monosomic lines with interspecific monosomic F1 (Mo × Pima 3-79) hybrids: (a) substitution of chromosome 6 (Mo92 × F15395) (10402) (25II + 1I); (b) substitution of chromosome 12 (Mo94 × F183) (2991) (25II + 1I); (c) substitution of chromosome 4 BC1F1 (Mo58 × F15303) (1151); (d) BC1F1 (Mo60 × F16945) (1175); and (e) BC1F1 (Mo75 × F11042) (2983) (25II + 1I). (Univalent arrowed). Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 24
Figure 24
Metaphase I in BC1F1 hybrids obtained from crosses of monosomic lines with interspecific monosomic F1 (Mo × Pima 3-79) hybrids: (a) substitution of chromosome 7 (Mo27 × F16874) (1115) (25II + 1I); (b) substitution of chromosome 18 (Mo48 × F152916) (1141) (25II +1I); (c) substitution of chromosome 22 (Mo17 × F16857) (1101) (25II + 1I). (Univalent arrowed.) Scale bar = 10 µm.
Figure 25
Figure 25
Telophase II in a monosomic BC1F1 (Mo48 × F152916) hybrid (1141): (a) dyad; (b) pentad; (c) octad. Scale bar = 40 µm.
Figure 26
Figure 26
Fertile (coloured) and sterile (uncoloured) pollen grains in a aneuploid hybrid BC1F1 obtained from a cross between a aneuploid line and a aneuploid hybrid F1 (Mo × Pima 3-79 or Telo × Pima 3-79): (a,b) BC1F1 (Mo60 × F16945) (1174); (c) BC1F1 (Mo34 × F16889) (2933); and (d) BC1F1 (Telo12 × F15428) (56115).
Figure 27
Figure 27
Chromosome identification of monosomic BC1F1 (Mo16 × F1986) hybrids. SSR primer pairs specific for chromosome 2 of the Atsubgenome JESPR179.
Figure 28
Figure 28
Chromosome identification of monosomic BC1F1 (Mo34 × F16889) hybrids. SSR primer pairs specific for chromosome 6 of the Atsubgenome Gh082.
Figure 29
Figure 29
Plants of the parental lines L-458 (a) and Pima 3-79 (b) disomic F1 hybrid L-458 × Pima 3-79 (c) (Mo × Pima 3-79) and F1BC1 obtained from crosses of the recurrent parent; (d) monosomic line for chromosome 2, Mo16; (e) F1(Mo16 × Pima 3-79) (982); and (f) substitution of chromosome 2 BC1F1(Mo16 × F1982) (9237).
Figure 30
Figure 30
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 4, Mo59 (a); F1Mo59 × Pima 3-79 (5312) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo59 × F15312) (10414) with substitution for chromosome 4 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 31
Figure 31
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 6, Mo34 (a); F1Mo34 × Pima 3-79 (6889) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo34 × F16889) (2933) with substitution for chromosome 6 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 32
Figure 32
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 7, Mo27 (a); F1Mo27 × Pima 3-79 (6874) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo27 × F16874) (1112) with substitution for chromosome 7 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 33
Figure 33
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 12, Mo94 (a); F1Mo94 × Pima 3-79 (81) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo94 × F181) (2991) with substitution for chromosome 12 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 34
Figure 34
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 17, Mo56 (a); F1Mo56 × Pima 3-79 (417) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo56 × F1417) (5138) with substitution for chromosome 17 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 35
Figure 35
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 18, Mo48 (a); F1Mo48 × Pima 3-79 (52916) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo48 × F152916) (11420) with substitution for chromosome 18 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 36
Figure 36
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 21, Mo42 (a); F1 Mo42 × Pima 3-79 (5281) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo42 × F15281) (7821) with substitution for chromosome 21 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 37
Figure 37
Plants of monosomic line G. hirsutum for chromosome 22, Mo17 (a); F1 Mo17 × Pima 3-79 (6857) (b); and BC1F1 (Mo17 × F16857) (1101) with substitution for chromosome 22 G. barbadense (c).
Figure 38
Figure 38
Plants of the parental line and monotelodisome F1 and F1BC1 cotton hybrids obtained from crosses of the recurrent parent with monotelodisome F1 hybrids (Telo12 × Pima 3-79): (a) monotelodisome line Telo12, chromosome 6; (b) F1 Telo12 × Pima 3-79 (54216); and (c) BC1F1 (Telo12 × F154216) (56115) with substitution of an arm of chromosome 6.
Figure 39
Figure 39
Plants of the parental line and monotelodisomic F1 and F1BC1 hybrids obtained from crosses of the recurrent parent with monotelodisome F1 hybrids (Telo × Pima 3-79): (a) monotelodisome line Mo21, chromosome 11; (b) F1Mo21 × Pima 3-79 (1021); and (c) BC1F1(Mo21 × F11021) (2921) with substitution of an arm of chromosome 11.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wendel J.F., Grover C.E. Taxonomy and Evolution of the Cotton Genus. In: Fang D.D., Percy R.G., editors. Gossypium. American Society of Agronomy, Inc.; Crop Science Society of America, Inc.; Soil Science Society of America, Inc.; Madison, WI, USA: 2015. pp. 25–44. Agronomy Monographs. (In Cotton) - DOI
    1. Wu Y., Liu F., Yang D.G., Li W., Zhou X.J., Xiao Y.P., Liu Y.G., He K.L., Zhang W.S., Ren Z.Y., et al. Comparative chloroplast genomics of Gossypium species: Insights into repeat sequence variations and phylogeny. Front. Plant Sci. 2018;9:376. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2018.00376. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Chen Z., Feng K., Grover C.E., Li P., Liu F., Wang Y., Xu Q., Shang M., Zhou Z., Cai X., et al. Chloroplast DNA structural variation, phylogeny, and age of divergence among diploid cotton species. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0157183. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0157183. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Z., Ge X., Yang Z., Qin W., Sun G., Wang Z., Li Z., Liu J., Wu J., Wang Y., et al. Extensive intraspecific gene order and gene structural variations in upland cotton cultivars. Nat. Commun. 2019;10:s41467–s42019. doi: 10.1038/s41467-019-10820-x. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Yang Z., Qanmber G., Wang Z., Yang Z., Li F. Gossypium Genomics: Trends, Scope, and Utilization for Cotton Improvement. Trends Plant Sci. 2020;25:488–500. doi: 10.1016/j.tplants.2019.12.011. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources