Identification of QTL Associated with Regrowth Vigor Using the Nested Association Mapping Population in Switchgrass
- PMID: 35214899
- PMCID: PMC8874488
- DOI: 10.3390/plants11040566
Identification of QTL Associated with Regrowth Vigor Using the Nested Association Mapping Population in Switchgrass
Abstract
Switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.) is a warm-season perennial grass species that is utilized as forage for livestock and biofuel feedstock. The stability of biomass yield and regrowth vigor under changing harvest frequency would help manage potential fluctuations in the feedstock market and would provide a continuous supply of quality forage for livestock. This study was conducted to (i) assess the genetic variation and (ii) identify the quantitative trait loci (QTL) associated with regrowth vigor after multiple cuttings in lowland switchgrass. A nested association mapping (NAM) population comprising 2000 pseudo F2 progenies was genotyped with single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) markers derived from exome-capture sequencing and was evaluated for regrowth vigor in 2017 and 2018. The results showed significant variation among the NAM families in terms of regrowth vigor (p < 0.05). A total of 10 QTL were detected on 6 chromosomes: 1B, 5A, 5B, 6B, 7B, and 8A, explaining the phenotypic variation by up to 4.7%. The additive genetic effects of an individual QTL ranged from -0.13 to 0.26. No single QTL showed a markedly large effect, suggesting complex genetics underlying regrowth vigor in switchgrass. The homologs of candidate genes that play a variety of roles in developmental processes, including plant hormonal signal transduction, nucleotide biosynthesis, secondary metabolism, senescence, and responses to both biotic and abiotic stresses, were identified in the vicinity of QTL.
Keywords: nested association mapping (NAM) population; quantitative trait loci (QTL); regrowth vigor; single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP); switchgrass (Panicum virgatum L.).
Conflict of interest statement
The authors declare that there are no conflict of interest.
Figures
References
-
- Vogel K.P. Switchgrass. In: Moser L.E., Burson B.L., Sollenberger L.E., editors. Warm-Season (C4) Grasses. ASA, CSSA and SSSA; Madison, WI, USA: 2004. pp. 561–588.
-
- Porter C.L. An analysis of variation between upland and lowland switchgrass, Panicum virgatum L., in central Oklahoma. Ecology. 1966;47:980–992. doi: 10.2307/1935646. - DOI
-
- Casler M.D. Ecotypic variation among switchgrass populations from the Northern USA. Crop Sci. 2005;45:388. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2005.0388. - DOI
-
- Hopkins A.A., Taliaferro C.M., Murphy C.D., Christian D. Chromosome number and nuclear DNA content of several switchgrass populations. Crop Sci. 1996;36:1192–1195. doi: 10.2135/cropsci1996.0011183X003600050021x. - DOI
-
- Casler M.D. Switchgrass breeding, genetics, and genomics. In: Monti A., editor. Switchgrass: A Valuable Biomass Crop for Energy. Springer; London, UK: 2012. pp. 29–53.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Miscellaneous
