Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2022 Feb 15;12(4):644.
doi: 10.3390/nano12040644.

Minimizing the Silver Free Ion Content in Starch Coated Silver Nanoparticle Suspensions with Exchange Cationic Resins

Affiliations

Minimizing the Silver Free Ion Content in Starch Coated Silver Nanoparticle Suspensions with Exchange Cationic Resins

Catarina S M Martins et al. Nanomaterials (Basel). .

Abstract

This work describes the optimization of a methodology for the reduction of silver ions from silver nanoparticle suspensions obtained from low-yield laboratory procedures. The laboratory synthesis of silver nanoparticles following a bottom-up approach starting from silver nitrate, originates silver ions that were not reduced to their fundamental state for nanoparticles creation at the end of the process. However, it is well known that silver ions can easily influence chemical assays due to their chemical reactivity properties and can limit biological assays since they interfere with several biological processes, namely intracellular ones, leading to the death of living cells or organisms. As such, the presence of silver ions is highly undesirable when conducting biological assays to evaluate the influence of silver nanoparticles. We report the development of an easy, low-cost, and rapid methodology that is based on cation exchange resins to minimize the silver ion content in a raw suspension of silver nanoparticles while preserving the integrity of the nanomaterials. This procedure preserves the physical-chemical properties of the nanoparticles, thus allowing the purified nanoparticulate systems to be biologically tested. Different types of cationic resins were tested, and the developed methodology was optimized by changing several parameters. A reduction from 92% to 10% of free silver/total silver ratio was achieved when using the Bio-Rad 50W-X8 100-200 mesh resin and a contact time of 15 min. Filtration by vacuum was used to separate the used resin from the nanoparticles suspension, allowing it to be further reused, as well as the purified AgNPs suspension.

Keywords: AgNPs; cation exchange; green chemistry; purification; resin; separation; silver nanoparticles.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
TEM images of AgNPs at different magnifications: (A): 50 nm; (B): 20 nm.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Influence of stirring and resin mass (Dowex 50W-X8 50–100 mesh) on the Ag Total ratio. (A)—S-OFF; (B)—S-ON (●—0.25 g of resin; ●—0.50 g of resin; ●—1.00 g of resin); inset in (B)—amplification of results in the Figure 2B comprising Ag Total ratios till the value of 0.15. The represented values are the average of three replicates for each different assay.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Influence of stirring and resin mass (Dowex 50W-X8 50–100 mesh) on the AgNPs ratio. (A)—S-OFF; (B)—S-ON (●—0.25 g of resin; ●—0.50 g of resin; ●—1.00 g of resin). The represented values are the average of 3 replicates for each different assay.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Influence of stirring and resin mass (Dowex 50W-X8 50–100 mesh) on the purification ratio (%) of AgNPs suspensions. ●—0.25 g of resin, S-OFF; ●—0.50 g of resin, S-OFF; ●—0.25 g of resin, S-ON; ●—0.50 g of resin, S-ON; ●—1.00 g of resin, S-ON. The represented values are the average of three replicates for each different assay.
Figure 5
Figure 5
The influence of the resin mass (Bio-Rad 50W-X8 100–200 mesh) on the removal ratio of the Ag+ present in suspension over time (●—0.25 g of resin; ●—0.50 g of resin; ●—1.00 g of resin): (A)—Ag total ratio in the suspension; (B)—AgNPs ratio in the suspension; (C)—Purification ratio (%). The represented values are the average of 3 replicates for each different assay.
Figure 6
Figure 6
(A)—Variation of the Purification ratio (%) at 15 min of adsorption time, with the different masses of resin; (B)—Confirmation of the variation of the Purification ratio (%) at 15 min of adsorption time, by varying the resin mass between 0.25–2.00 g (logarithmic scale for the resin mass).
Figure 7
Figure 7
Influence of the resin mass (Bio-Rad 50W-X8 200–400 mesh) on the removal ratio of Ag+ present in suspension over time (●—0.25 g of resin; ●—0.50 g of resin; ●—1.00 g of resin): (A)—Ag total ratio in the suspension; (B)—AgNPs ratio in the suspension; (C)—Purification ratio (%). The represented values are the average of 3 replicates for each different assay.
Figure 8
Figure 8
Variation in the purification ratio (%) at 15 min of adsorption time with the different masses of the resin Bio-Rad 50W-X8 200–400 mesh.

References

    1. Yu S.-J., Yin Y.-G., Liu J.-F. Silver nanoparticles in the environment. Environ. Sci. Process. Impacts. 2013;15:78–92. doi: 10.1039/C2EM30595J. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Liu J.-F., Yu S.-J., Yin Y.-G., Chao J.-B. Methods for separation, identification, characterization and quantification of silver nanoparticles. TrAC Trends Anal. Chem. 2012;33:95–106. doi: 10.1016/j.trac.2011.10.010. - DOI
    1. Martins C.S.M., Sousa H.B.A., Prior J.A.V. From Impure to Purified Silver Nanoparticles: Advances and Timeline in Separation Methods. Nanomaterials. 2021;11:3407. doi: 10.3390/nano11123407. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Kahnouji Y.A., Mosaddegh E., Bolorizadeh M.A. Detailed analysis of size-separation of silver nanoparticles by density gradient centrifugation method. Mater. Sci. Eng. C Mater. Biol. Appl. 2019;103:109817. doi: 10.1016/j.msec.2019.109817. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Lee S.H., Salunke B.K., Kim B.S. Sucrose density gradient centrifugation separation of gold and silver nanoparticles synthesized using Magnolia kobus plant leaf extracts. Biotechnol. Bioprocess Eng. 2014;19:169–174. doi: 10.1007/s12257-013-0561-4. - DOI