Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2022 Feb 14;14(4):805.
doi: 10.3390/nu14040805.

The Effect of ß-Glucan Prebiotic on Kidney Function, Uremic Toxins and Gut Microbiome in Stage 3 to 5 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Predialysis Participants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

The Effect of ß-Glucan Prebiotic on Kidney Function, Uremic Toxins and Gut Microbiome in Stage 3 to 5 Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD) Predialysis Participants: A Randomized Controlled Trial

Zarina Ebrahim et al. Nutrients. .

Abstract

There is growing evidence that gut dysbiosis contributes to the progression of chronic kidney disease (CKD) owing to several mechanisms, including microbiota-derived uremic toxins, diet and immune-mediated factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the effect of a ß-glucan prebiotic on kidney function, uremic toxins and the gut microbiome in stage 3 to 5 CKD participants. Fifty-nine participants were randomized to either the ß-glucan prebiotic intervention group (n = 30) or the control group (n = 29). The primary outcomes were to assess kidney function (urea, creatinine and glomerular filtration rate), plasma levels of total and free levels of uremic toxins (p-cresyl sulfate (pCS), indoxyl-sulfate (IxS), p-cresyl glucuronide (pCG) and indoxyl 3-acetic acid (IAA) and gut microbiota using 16S rRNA sequencing at baseline, week 8 and week 14. The intervention group (age 40.6 ± 11.4 y) and the control group (age 41.3 ± 12.0 y) did not differ in age or any other socio-demographic variables at baseline. There were no significant changes in kidney function over 14 weeks. There was a significant reduction in uremic toxin levels at different time points, in free IxS at 8 weeks (p = 0.003) and 14 weeks (p < 0.001), free pCS (p = 0.006) at 14 weeks and total and free pCG (p < 0.001, p < 0.001, respectively) and at 14 weeks. There were no differences in relative abundances of genera between groups. Enterotyping revealed that the population consisted of only two of the four enterotypes: Bacteroides 2 and Prevotella. The redundancy analysis showed a few factors significantly affected the gut microbiome: these included triglyceride levels (p < 0.001), body mass index (p = 0.002), high- density lipoprotein (p < 0.001) and the prebiotic intervention (p = 0.002). The ß-glucan prebiotic significantly altered uremic toxin levels of intestinal origin and favorably affected the gut microbiome.

Keywords: chronic kidney disease (CKD); gut microbiome; prebiotic; uremic toxins.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
CONSORT flow diagram on the effects of a ß-glucan prebiotic on kidney function, plasma levels of uremic toxins and the gut microbiome in predialysis participants with CKD stage 3 to 5.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematic representation of the study flow; Nutrition status includes anthropometry, clinical, dietary assessment, other nutrition-related biochemical tests.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Relative abundances at the genera level.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Enterotype percentages of the intervention and control group over time.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Alpha and beta diversity comparisons by groups. (A) Principal coordinate analysis (PCoA2) of inter-individual differences (beta diversity) by Bray–Curtis dissimilarity. (B) Alpha diversity according to the Shannon index. (C) Within-group inter-individual Bray–Curtis distance.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Cumulative effect size of covariates affecting the compositional variation of the gut microbiome selected by the redundancy analysis (grey bars) compared with individual effect sizes assuming independence (black bars).

References

    1. Bikbov B., Purcell C.A., Levey A.S., Smith M., Abdoli A., Abebe M., Adebayo O.M., Afarideh M., Agarwal S.K., Agudelo-Botero M., et al. Global, regional, and national burden of chronic kidney disease, 1990–2017: A systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2017. Lancet. 2020;395:709–733. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(20)30045-3. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hill N.R., Fatoba S.T., Oke J.L., Hirst J.A., O’Callaghan C.A., Lasserson D.S., Hobbs F.D.R. Global Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease—A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0158765. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0158765. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Perico N., Remuzzi G. Chronic kidney disease in sub-Saharan Africa: A public health priority. Lancet Glob. Health. 2014;2:e124–e125. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(14)70014-2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Arogundade F.A., Omotoso B.A., Adelakun A., Bamikefa T., Ezeugonwa R., Omosule B., Sanusi A.A., Balogun R.A. Burden of end-stage renal disease in sub-Saharan Africa. Clin. Nephrol. 2020;93:3–7. doi: 10.5414/CNP92S101. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Thompson S., James M., Wiebe N., Hemmelgarn B., Manns B., Klarenbach S., Tonelli M. Cause of Death in Patients with Reduced Kidney Function. J. Am. Soc. Nephrol. 2015;26:2504–2511. doi: 10.1681/ASN.2014070714. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types