Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2022 Feb 11;14(4):686.
doi: 10.3390/polym14040686.

Advances in Cruciform Biaxial Testing of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers

Sergio Horta Muñoz  1 , María Del Carmen Serna Moreno  1
Affiliations
Review

Advances in Cruciform Biaxial Testing of Fibre-Reinforced Polymers

Sergio Horta Muñoz et al. Polymers (Basel). .

Abstract

The heterogeneity and anisotropy of fibre-reinforced polymer matrix composites results in a highly complex mechanical response and failure under multiaxial loading states. Among the different biaxial testing techniques, tests with cruciform specimens have been a preferred option, although nowadays, they continue to raise a lack of consensus. It is therefore necessary to review the state of the art of this testing methodology applied to fibre-reinforced polymers. In this context, aspects such as the specific constituents, the geometric design of the specimen or the application of different tensile/compressive load ratios must be analysed in detail before being able to establish a suitable testing procedure. In addition, the most significant results obtained in terms of the analytical, numerical and experimental analyses of the biaxial tests with cruciform specimens are collected. Finally, significant modifications proposed in literature are detailed, which can lead to variants or adaptations of the tests with cruciform specimens, increasing their scope.

Keywords: biaxial loading; cruciform specimen; failure theories; fibre-reinforced polymer; finite element method; multiaxial; tensile/compressive loading; testing facility.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Triaxial testing facility at University of Castilla-La Mancha (UCLM, Spain): (a) triaxial testing machine. (b) CFRP cruciform specimen being tested under biaxial tensile–tensile loading.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Schematisation of the most frequently used geometrical features in cruciform specimens: (a) Single radius corner. (b) Double radii filleted corner. (c) Elliptical corner. (d) Slotted arms.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Gauge zone designs frequently found in literature: (a) Squared central zone. (b) Circular central zone. (c) Rhomboidal central zone. (d) Double tapering.
Figure 4
Figure 4
3D model of a quarter of cruciform specimen presenting different techniques for thickness tapering: (a) Stepped transition. (b) Linear reduction. (c) Curved transition.
Figure 5
Figure 5
3D model of the anti-buckling device developed by Serna Moreno and Horta Muñoz [82].
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kaddour A.S., Hinton M.J. Failure Criteria for Composites. Volume 1. Elsevier Ltd.; Amsterdam, The Netherlands: 2017. pp. 573–600. - DOI
    1. Hinton M.J., Soden P.D. Predicting failure in composite laminates: The background to the exercise. Compos. Sci. Technol. 1998;58:1001–1010. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(98)00074-8. - DOI
    1. Hinton M.J., Kaddour A.S., Soden P.D. Evaluation of failure prediction in composite laminates: Background to “part B” of the exercise. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2002;62:1481–1488. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00094-5. - DOI
    1. Soden P.D., Hinton M.J., Kaddour A.S. Biaxial test results for strength and deformation of a range of E-glass and carbon fibre reinforced composite laminates. Failure exercise benchmark data. Fail. Criteria Fibre-Reinf. Polym. Compos. 2004;62:52–96. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00093-3. - DOI
    1. Soden P.D., Kaddour A.S., Hinton M.J. Recommendations for designers and researchers resulting from the world-wide failure exercise. Compos. Sci. Technol. 2004;64:1223–1251. doi: 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00228-8. - DOI

LinkOut - more resources