Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis
- PMID: 35216830
- DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2022.01.008
Fresh embryo transfer after in vitro insemination of fresh vs. cryopreserved anonymous donor oocytes: which has a better live birth rate? A Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System analysis
Abstract
Objective: To determine if transfer of fresh embryos derived from fresh or cryopreserved donor oocytes yields a higher live birth rate.
Design: Historical cohort study.
Setting: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System database.
Patient(s): A total of 24,663 fresh embryo transfer cycles of donor oocytes.
Intervention(s): None.
Main outcome measure(s): The primary outcome was live births per number of embryos transferred on day 5. The secondary outcomes included number of infants per embryo transfer, surplus embryos cryopreserved, and characterization of US oocyte recipients.
Result(s): A total of 16,073 embryo transfers were from fresh oocytes and 8,590 were from cryopreserved oocytes. Recipient age, body mass index (BMI), gravidity, and parity were similar between the groups. Most recipients were of White non-Hispanic race (66.9%), followed by Asian (13.7%), Black non-Hispanic (9.3%), and Hispanic (7.2%). Fresh oocyte cycles were more likely to use elective single embryo transfer (42.5% vs. 37.8%) or double embryo transfer (53.2% vs. 50.4%) and resulted in more surplus embryos for cryopreservation (4.6 vs. 1.2). The live birth rate from fresh oocytes was 57.5% vs. 49.7% from cryopreserved oocytes. Negative predictors of live birth included the use of cryopreserved oocytes (odds ratio [OR] 0.731, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.665-0.804), Black non-Hispanic race (OR 0.603, 95% CI 0.517-0.703), Asian race (OR 0.756, 95% CI 0.660-0.867), and increasing recipient BMI (OR 0.982, 95% CI 0.977-0.994) after controlling for recipient age, number of embryos transferred on day 5, and unexplained infertility diagnosis. The proportion of multifetal deliveries was greater in cycles utilizing fresh (26.4%) vs. cryopreserved (20.6%) oocytes.
Conclusion(s): The live birth rate is higher with use of fresh oocytes vs. cryopreserved oocytes in fresh embryo transfer cycles. Negative live birth predictors include recipient Black non-Hispanic or Asian race and increasing BMI.
Keywords: Donor egg; IVF; fresh embryo transfer; live birth; oocyte recipient.
Copyright © 2022 American Society for Reproductive Medicine. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Association of Fresh Embryo Transfers Compared With Cryopreserved-Thawed Embryo Transfers With Live Birth Rate Among Women Undergoing Assisted Reproduction Using Freshly Retrieved Donor Oocytes.JAMA. 2021 Jan 12;325(2):156-163. doi: 10.1001/jama.2020.23718. JAMA. 2021. PMID: 33433574 Free PMC article.
-
Cryopreserved oocyte versus fresh oocyte assisted reproductive technology cycles, United States, 2013.Fertil Steril. 2017 Jan;107(1):110-118. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2016.10.002. Epub 2016 Nov 11. Fertil Steril. 2017. PMID: 27842997 Free PMC article.
-
Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy is associated with reduced live birth rates in fresh but not frozen donor oocyte in vitro fertilization cycles: an analysis of 18,562 donor cycles reported to Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System.Fertil Steril. 2025 Jan;123(1):50-60. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.08.315. Epub 2024 Aug 10. Fertil Steril. 2025. PMID: 39128672
-
Guidelines for the number of embryos to transfer following in vitro fertilization No. 182, September 2006.Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008 Aug;102(2):203-16. doi: 10.1016/j.ijgo.2008.01.007. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2008. PMID: 18773532 Review.
-
Evidence-based outcomes after oocyte cryopreservation for donor oocyte in vitro fertilization and planned oocyte cryopreservation: a guideline.Fertil Steril. 2021 Jul;116(1):36-47. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.02.024. Fertil Steril. 2021. PMID: 34148587 Review.
Cited by
-
From glass to life: a commentary on the assessment of the reproductive potential of cryopreserved human oocytes.J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022 Sep;39(9):1993-1996. doi: 10.1007/s10815-022-02565-2. Epub 2022 Jul 16. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022. PMID: 35841480 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
-
Frozen autologous and donor oocytes are associated with differences in clinical and neonatal outcomes compared with fresh oocytes: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System Analysis.F S Rep. 2023 Nov 10;5(1):40-46. doi: 10.1016/j.xfre.2023.11.003. eCollection 2024 Mar. F S Rep. 2023. PMID: 38524209 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources